ELLE........ are you suggesting JO is the one who stole or killed Haleigh? Sounds like you think he is the culprit now.
What is the motive for JO or Tommy to have done this?
So, Elle, you are suggesting JO is the perp because LE questioned him for hours on end, therefore he looks guilty.
Well, look at it this way, he allowed them to question him for hours on end.....better than some have. From the last article I read about rc .... he resisted talking to them from March to Aug 18....hmmm
Actually, I would. I do not have the time to go through your long post at the moment but glancing at it, it doesn't prove that JO was the perp. It appears you have selected him and are listing reasons but the reasons do not have merit due to the people who reported most of these events.
lol...you would, then you say that you don't have the time to go through my post, I don't care if you read my post or not...lol.
I haven't "selected"anyone, I am stating who I am suspicious of because you asked me.
If someone was proven to be the perp we wouldn't be discussing our thoughts about who took Haleigh, nothing is proven. As far the people that I am referring to having no merit, that is your opinion and conclusion, we might know better who has merit after the facts come out and we can truly discuss what happened on Feb 9/10.
This is a sincere question, elle.
Was it in the detailed timeline theory thread? (thank you)
p.s. Did we ever get a drug sales link re: Tommy/Jr?
No. it isn't. It is in the detailed theory case analysis thread that cyberborg started awhile ago. I truthfully had no desire to post my theory but was asked to, so I did. It is very easy to say that there was an accident and Ronald or Misty harmed Haleigh and are involved in a cover up, but when you actually sit down and write it all out and account for everything that would HAVE TO happen or be in place, it isn't so easy to believe in a particular theory anymore.
This is a sincere question LFlorida, why do you think it is necessary to tell me that you are asking a sincere question? Do you usually ask insincere questions? I have read many of your posts and have never thought you were insincere at all.
As far as the drug sales link, I didn't know that Tommy was selling drugs, I thought he was stealing them from his father for his own consumption.
This is all I am going to say about Joe:
It is a leap to go from burglary (homes) to kidnapping, rape or murder.
A child taken for sex by a stranger or SO is usually found near by, discarded.
It would be stupid to use the same MO that would give you away, especially if you are in town and have been to the MH.
I really think the staging was to point to cousin Joe to one, remove focus from Misty and or Ron. And two, Misty didn't like him, and the whole stealing of the gun thing, this was a good way to pay him back.
The home was occupied, by two other people.
These are the reasons I have no radar going on for Joe. It's too obvious. JMO
Bold by me...I hear you, but it is also a leap for me to believe that Ronald killed Haleigh, or even that Misty killed her, I could believe their was an accidental overdose but where did the drugs come from? Was Ronald selling them out of his home? Was Misty?
You are talking about a household that has been under the microscope of Department of Children and Family Services, numerous times. Yet they still thought the children were safer and better off with Ronald. I think there is a good reason for that. I do not believe that DCF is corrupt and I do not believe that they were negligent in their investigations. I think Ronald was getting his life together and some people in Satsuma didn't like that. There is no proof that Ronald was using drugs or involved with drugs in the past two years, if there is and I missed it please show me.
As far as Joe being too obvious, I would love for LE to rule him out, but they haven't. I don't think Joe took Haleigh for sex, I think Tommy and Joe panicked and did something in the heat of the moment, or even for revenge, maybe they didn't think things would get so out of hand...who knows. One thing I believe though Bern, Joe took off for a reason, he knows something and maybe he wasn't directly involved with whatever happened to Haleigh...but I believe he took the van and put the scratch on it, I think he knows something.
BBM-
What exactly are you refering to?
So do you completely discount there being an accident and MC/RC covering it up? If so, why?
I am saying that if there was an accident it didn't happen inside the trailer because even if PCSO missed evidence there, the FDLE and the FBI were called in very early to investigate the trailer. If there was an accident inside the trailer, I believe there would have been evidence of that. If you think that an accident happened then why do you feel LE is lying and saying that Haleigh was abducted, albeit not a stranger abduction, but an abduction?
I really don't count anything out, because we have so little facts and information from Law Enforcement that we are hopping all over the internet to try to get more information.
The absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence.