IMO, the shirt appears to be on backwards in the photo taken on the scene.(see ttached minus the full head view)
However, the 2 photos that were circulating around the forum (attached) appear to be very similar except one is embedded in the autopsy report and is referred to as photo 50 in the autopsy report. It shows the front of the shirt and the title of the photos is:
"Photo 50 Position of the hole in the vest worn by the deceased during the incident"
Van Staden photographed her on the scene with clothes and without. She would have been removed from the scene without clothes.
IF the shirt was on backwards when Van Staden photographed her
AND IF the front does contain tissue and bone fragments on the right,
then the ONLY inference that can be drawn is that OP switched the shirt from front to back AFTER his murderous rampage.
Why? I can only guess that if it happened it was to cover up something he felt might be very incriminating.
Wait..so the idea that her shirt was on backwards is speculation based on looking at photos? It's been stated as fact here so many times I thought it was part of the forensics. Is it not?