norest4thewicked
True Crime Writer
This post could hve been a response to any of the posts about phones. That said AND in the spirit of debate:
As I am reading these posts something came to mind about Juggalos and social media. "Social networking websites are a popular conveyance for Juggalo sub-culture to communicate and expand, the FBI warns.http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/fbi-gang-insane-clown-posse/
IMHO A reason the phones may be missing is that there are pictures of the crime of abduction being committed. We have seen videos online and people arrested for videotaping their crimes. The beating of David Ivins in New Jersey comes to mind. http://newyork.cbslocal.com/tag/david-ivins/
While Jeremy's reasoning may be that they didn't want us to call anyone, he is not a Juggalo; he is a lower middle class father of 2, homeowner, working to maintain a certain level of comfort for his little family. Is he able to comprehend the mindset of a criminal who would, being familiar with the neighborhood, see an opportunity to steal a child, take pics of it AND load those pics of the crime on ICP/Juggalo sites? IMHO I don't think that Jeremy thinks in those terms. I do believe, from crime stats, that Juggalos are capable of this type of action.
I don't believe that MW and her 'posse' can be discounted. I also don't believe that Jeremy would have any concept of this type of criminal mindset, except in the abstract.
I think that pulling the Juggalo aspect back into this is going around in circles. For one thing, although we know that MW considered herself a Juggalo (wannabe), we know nothing about the other people in that house, save for Dane, and he just seems like a petty . Did he ever proclaim that he was a Juggalo?
I think that we have one Juggalo wannabe in this case and now we've jumped to her stealing a baby to "upload the crime on a Juggalo site" is just going waaaaay too far. Occams razor and all.