Rallihanna
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 813
- Reaction score
- 2
I just have this feeling that when we are finally told everything - if that even occurs - much of what we think is known on this case won't be accurate.
Wow!!!......hmmmm :waitasec:.I just have this feeling that when we are finally told everything - if that even occurs - much of what we think is known on this case won't be accurate.
I don't know about anyone else, but I don't much care for this statement.
It negates the idea that the Easter find has anything to do with giving an indication that Holly may be alive.
But why did she preface it all with "To My Knowledge"? :sleuth:
Like, that's one of the world's biggest qualifiers and/or disclaimer preface clauses. They train you to talk like that in Statements and Depositions 101. Also in Consulting work.
:banghead:
I notice she said "is" - which is absolute - and so, of course, she must say they have no absolute indications.
If she had said "may" in place of "is", we'd have a different statement. Possibly.
BeanE would just beat on me if she was here. But she's not. I hope she knows she's missed.
I just have this feeling that when we are finally told everything - if that even occurs - much of what we think is known on this case won't be accurate.
If we go by just what news reports/links we have.....there is no report of dogs picking up her scent.....anywhere. BUT.....this task force is keeping info VERY close to the cuff so for all we know......one/some of the dogs could very well have tracked her scent up to a point. We don't know.I just think we all believe stuff like the "being led into the woods" but then we hear that the dogs didn't pick up any scents (now that was just a report and could've been wrong). It definitely makes it hard to sleuth when we don't know which direction to go in!
You know how I read that entire statement? They have a theory, they just don't know where Holly is or if she is alive. I bet this case breaks in the coming days. Someone has shown their hand. MOO
I just think we all believe stuff like the "being led into the woods" but then we hear that the dogs didn't pick up any scents (now that was just a report and could've been wrong). It definitely makes it hard to sleuth when we don't know which direction to go in!
it is a man in his late 30s to late 40s, and it is not an ex-boyfriend.
Oh that TBI lady said "to my knowledge" which only has to mean she has not physically seen Holly. Would still be really hard to pull off but hey stranger things have happened. If she is alive I don't think she is able to talk (coma, traumatized, what have you) or she does not know who it was.
The Bible Verse: I thought it was her mom's favorite verse then I read it was Holly's. Either way if you ask a young person to quote their favorite Bible verse it's going to be Philippians 4:13 or John 3:16. I would say 99% of the time because those verses are burned into our memory banks from a very young age. I think it is coincidental. Would I have said that at her age? Absolutely. First thought that comes to mind type thing.
The blood: Has anyone thought it was blood from one of the dogs? Maybe the man had to shut a dog up so it hurt it? Flecks, spatters, whatever the latest term is to describe the blood could have been from a dog running away. The TBI would NOT confirm if it was human blood.
I am beginning to think for various reasons that Holly knew this person in passing, enough to be friendly and say hi how are you, it is a man in his late 30s to late 40s, and it is not an ex-boyfriend.
Hope we hear something more soon... interest in the case is waning which is too bad.
so ... are we abandoning the several young men theory?
I don't know about anyone else, but I don't much care for this statement.
It negates the idea that the Easter find has anything to do with giving an indication that Holly may be alive.
But why did she preface it all with "To My Knowledge"? :sleuth:
Like, that's one of the world's biggest qualifiers and/or disclaimer preface clauses. They train you to talk like that in Statements and Depositions 101. Also in Consulting work.
:banghead:
I notice she said "is" - which is absolute - and so, of course, she must say they have no absolute indications.
If she had said "may" in place of "is", we'd have a different statement. Possibly.
BeanE would just beat on me if she was here. But she's not. I hope she knows she's missed.
LE has not made any kind of statement that the community is in danger, that there is a predator on the loose, or given any indication that this is anything except all about Holly.
And like it or not, people do lose interest if they cannot relate the crime to their own lives.