LucyOso
Verified Registered Nurse
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,063
- Reaction score
- 4,191
You've brought up a good point. The is a big difference between being able to claim an insanity defence as opposed to mental illnesses being considered as mitigating factors during sentencing.
I'm sure many of you have heard of the McNaughton (M'Naghten) rule, which was the first legal test/standard used to determine sane/not sane for standing trial. At the most basic level, the rule determined that if someone didn't know right from wrong, they could be declared insane. (That's an uber simplistic interpretation, but it's close enough).
Through the years, the laws have been challenged, and refined based on sometimes subtle nuances to create additional rules, like a plea of 'diminished capacity', which isn't quite the same thing as being declared legally insane.
And farther along the spectrum of psyche defenses are what is called 'mitigating factors', which often play into consideration during sentencing. Especially in death penalty cases. This is when things like bi-polar, history of abuse, low IQ usually come into play when it has been established that a suspect knew right from wrong at the time of their crime. The defense will argue that the suspect had psychological overlays that effected their judgements, or their ability to respond 'normally' to situations they knew were 'wrong'.
(I'm over simplifying this... but here is a decent 'quick and dirty' overview from Cornell Law if you want a better summary & more details:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/background/insane/insanity.html
My expectation is that TM's lawyers MAY try for a diminished capacity defence, dependent upon medical history in general, and especially history that might support a claim that AM was abusive & controlling.
Regardless, based on what her family has shared, I'm 99.999% certain that her attorneys will present any reports of 'slowness', mania, suicide attempts, etc. to plead for a life sentence rather than the DP. At this stage, they're already thinking about how they can keep TM alive.
And they won't have trouble getting witnesses. Bobbi, Mom Tate, past teachers, the neighbours who'd see TM screaming at Adam. The previous LE visit to the house for a suicide threat.
Legally, I think TM is most likely in a very good position to escape the DP. And between now & when she goes to trial, she'll be under medical supervision, including a med-run, if it is required. Which means by the time she testifies (or takes a plea), she might be more lucid and able to tell her story coherently.
Thank you. I agree she needs to be evaluated for capacity and culpability in this...