This whole case is just very unsettling. The confessions from the parents have not solved this case. They have only raised more questions. At this point having no body and seemingly no evidence to cooperate the parents confession I have to at least consider that this could be a case of coercion. From the first day of Joe's dissapearance the sheriff's department stated that there was no evidence of foul play. NONE!? Didn't they bring dogs in on the first day? I read somewhere that the accuracy of cadaver dogs is 95% detection after only 2 minutes of death. If Joe was killed in his house and placed in the trunk of his father's car, why wouldn't the dogs pick up on that? Let's not forget there was also an eyewitness who claimed to have seen Joe wandering around the road at 1am. Now, I did not initially believe this account. I just figured this was some random person making this up. I mean for what reason would this person have to be driving around a rural back road at that time of night for an undisclosed reason? What kind of a person who sees a small child walking around alone in the middle of nowhere at that time of night doesn't stop to see if they are all right, try find there home or call the police? I just thought that couldn't be true until a few days ago the paper reported that the dogs had picked up Joe's scent and were indeed searching that area. So now it looks like there is no cooperating evidence to parents confession but is cooperating evidence to the eye witness account. I strongly feel they need to follow the evidence and take stronger view of this person. He's got a lot of explaining to do.