Martinez should just have no questions for Samuels. The only thing he's proven to me is that he's an expert in reading articles.
Just ask a question about his fishy past and say he has nothing further!
Martinez should just have no questions for Samuels. The only thing he's proven to me is that he's an expert in reading articles.
We are back in the court - the jury is not here until 11:00 . . . . defense has agreed to not present the slides on expressive vs. instrumental - (testimony from Friday).
JA is talking with the deputy briefly . . . .
Sidebar
Court is in recess until 11:00
so let me get this straight....over the weekend the defense had a come to jesus moment and realized their skeevy "expert" was sinking their sheep further and fired him? so no more mr. skeeves today? yeah!
I'll bet the two hours of "private cross" by JM on Thursday was enough to dissuade that man from trying to argue this in public. :twocents:
so let me get this straight....over the weekend the defense had a come to jesus moment and realized their skeevy "expert" was sinking their sheep further and fired him? so no more mr. skeeves today? yeah!
Just a reminder. No Skanks!! :nono:
Didn't JW argue on Thursday that nothing had changed about Samuels opinion, that it was the same it's always been? Well, if they've decided to not present this evidence, then apparently something changed.
Welcome Renee110!
Watch Samuels take the stand and JW say, "we have nothing further for this witness, your honor".
:furious:
:furious:
If I were JM..
I would call him on his background re: NJ and I would rest.
The jury ain't stupid.
Don't even give them a chance to introduce their withdrawn theorys via testimony to JM.
I'M READY TO ROCK...
A lot of courts aren't open on Friday...budgetary reasons.