Venom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Messages
- 1,389
- Reaction score
- 352
No Skanks! :nono:
Best juror question.
No Skanks! :nono:
I do think he has a thing for JA - he did not hate looking at those pictures. But I think he was saying he might have added the ankle part to try to cover for JA's lie. That's how it came across to me.
Well, what I gather from his testimony is that sometimes, when bad things happen, our brains block it out and we forget the traumatic event. Thanks Doc. What a revelation that is.
Samuels pretty much admitted she tailored her test questions to agree with her current "story". What makes him think she wouldn't do the same for the next "story"? As a doc, he should have the skills to ferret this out.
After all, she's not under OATH yet, and according to her, that's the only time she doesn't lie.
Is Samuels' math bad or is mine? Is 3-5/100,000 the same as 3 to 5% of 100,000? He uses them interchangeably. :floorlaugh:Morning all.
IMO I don't think Samuels sent Jodi cards and a gift because he was smitten with her, I think it was just about the monies. she needed to make it to trail for him to get his check.
I also think his unprepared act yesterday was intentional, I think he left items "on his desk" because he did not want them in that courtroom for some reason.
All moo
Sent from my SGH-S959G using Tapatalk 2
The name makes me sound so exotic, but I'm a very common Brit![]()
Yesterday's testimony by the good dr was cringe worthy. I was torn, he seemed so likeable & fatherly. But Martinez had every right to go after him, if even 1 of the jury began to give credibility to his theory it could persuade them to not give a 1st degree verdict.
It was sad in a way, I felt sorry for him as Martinez sensed every chink in his armour & went for him. I even think he's a decent man who seems way too naive to be dealing with the likes of Jodi. As he told his story of giving Jodi the 9 dollar book it was obvious he didnt see anything wrong, he just wanted to help. But Martinez was right, it was inappropriate for a professional who is meant to give an unbiased expert opinion.
I was amazed the defense let him get on the stand letting him base his opinion on Jodi from a test he admitted Jodi lied in. His little voice saying he probably should have given her another test reminded me of a little boy who forgot to do his homework. The defense should be ashamed of themselves. They didn't prepare the dr at all for his testimony & thought that Martinez wouldn't catch them out.
Please let them put Matt McCartney on the stand, that is 1 witness I would like to let Martinez get at- Star magazine anyone??
And more importantly, she is telling more than one version of her "story" ...again.All I know is it was hard enough to envision rope going around the headboard of that sleigh bed. Now you've got rope going around the FOOTBOARD? And there were NO PICTURES TAKEN? Oh, get real, fella! :twocents:
I hope the good Dr. shows up and is able to fOnction ok today!![]()
With A LOT of help from A_News_Junkie , here is a close up of her when she puts something in the folder.
![]()
My 7 year old keeps asking when this story is going to be over!
The court/MCAO has informed us that they are overwhelmed with phone calls with advice/suggestions regarding this case. Please refrain from calling the Maricopa County Attorney Office and/or Superior Court. Mr. Martinez has all the pertinent information he needs and is in complete control of his case. Thx for your support. ~Admin 2~
Form the Facebook prosecutor support page. I love the part where "he is completely in control of his case". Go JUAN!!!!!!
I hope the good Dr. shows up and is able to fOnction ok today!![]()
forgive for double post but I am bringing this over from the closed thread.
JA has given thieves a whole new access to burglary (IMO)
OMG . . . . Look what JA has taught to some thugs via her purported antics.
http://www.krem.com/news/Burglars-us...198885011.html