katiedid2
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2010
- Messages
- 4,092
- Reaction score
- 0
HLN keeps asking "but is the defense losing the jury?" Ya think??? They were lost lch ong ago, IMO.
You can only try to shove a square peg into a round hole for so long before everyone around you shuts down. It has been 34 days now.
Besides, they already went over all of this crap days ago. Waste. Huge waste.
ITA. I don't think that PTSD test (and therefore the diagnosis) should have been allowed in, as Samuels actually completed the questions himself. Who knows what he did in the 'translation'. Imagine if the prosecution did something like that? Out the window to screams of mistrial!
ITA
also wonder what the Juror(s) think IF their question is Not asked :waitasec: did/does the Judge explain the reasons why..
Ohh reminds me to ask ya'll.. (any WS'r)
What answer was given to what the word '*advertiser censored*' meant?
somehow missed it :giggle:
You can crush it up and put it in a big punch bowlBingo.
I had to turn off the stream today .. CANNOT listen to Sam the Sham & Willy for yet another day of same questioning.
(plus the new lies introduced).
Enough to drive me batty.
Reading great commentary here only for today.
I lasted 10 minutes of those two ... And turned off the live stream.
What a bunch of baloney.
Hope the jury feels the same!
Does any one think this Dr. will use his notes to answer juror questions?
Wild about trial says court resumes at 3:45 PST.What time did they go to recess??? I might be able to get my shower in while they're out!! Someone? Anyone??
The question asked about assault by a STRANGER.
I'm pretty sure from Juan's cross that answer will be an eye opening YES.
That was one of the tension breaking moments in court. Judge S. hoped she'd be able to not smile or laugh out loud when she asked Jodi. We all had the image of her bursting out laughing and it felt good.
I wonder if the State had their experts interview Jodi?
I think they are going to imply that she had PTSD from events that occured before June 4th and that Travis threatened her with the knife, causing her to 'flash back' (due to PTSD) to her being assaulted with a knife, at the age of twelve. She then went into 'fight or flight' and went into fognesia while defending herself.
I can't help but notice what odd clothing choices Ms Willmot and the MS continue to make. The lavender color is so off and the pink dress with the big bow on the side seem so inappropriate in a court. I know it sounds petty but IMO it is not.
A person makes a judgement and forms an opinion about another person in what, 5-7 seconds?
If I were consulting, I would make sure the Defense was dressed in appropriate dark suits, no flashy jewelry or distracting fashion choices; something appropriately somber for a death penalty trail.
I recall from the CA case that LDB was always professionally dressed in dark suit. Nothing to distract from her presentation in court.
I have (personally) formed an impression that Willmott is not a very good attorney. On a certain level, her poor choice of clothing is confirming that I am right. I am distracted by her ill-fitting fitting suit; the color reads "too young and not serious", srsly, was the suit painted on her; and I can see her her bra lines digging into her back.
So much wrong on so many levels.
This forms a very bad impression on me, on top of I already think she is not a good attorney. If I don't like how she presents and dresses how can she make me like her client?
Another question that I can't get right in my head is the big deal about PTSD and how it relates to her killing Travis. I would think that they would need to explore why she killed him in the first place as opposed to worrying about what she suffered after killing him. Maybe I am reading it wrong but it sure makes you wonder.
I will be a bit surprised if Nurmi doesn't come in after this break asking for a mistrial because Ms. DeMarte shared the raw data with JM.