Linda From New York
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 1,339
- Reaction score
- 4
I bet there aren't many questions left so that means Willmott soon. :facepalm:
:hills:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I bet there aren't many questions left so that means Willmott soon. :facepalm:
you guys see in the court watchers thread that a juror was mouthing something to jodi as they left the courtroom for lunch at that point when jodi became animated with wilmott?
I think there was an appeal at another trial over the spectators wearing buttons with the victims picture on it. It went up to the higher courts I believe, and I wish I could remember the name of the case.
Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the standard for when a federal court can grant habeas corpus relief to overturn a criminal conviction based on the state court's misapplication of established federal law. At issue was whether a criminal defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial was violated when relatives of the alleged victim were permitted to sit in the courtroom as spectators during trial, wearing buttons that displayed the victim's image.
The Supreme Court ruled that the state court did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law when it upheld the conviction. The Court's prior rulings on when courtroom practices prejudiced the right to a fair trial were limited to state-sponsored conduct, and had consequently left it an open question regarding the conduct of spectators.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carey_v._Musladin
I absolutely agree!!! Hello, Cluster B.My thinking is he probably didn't want to go any further to diagnosis it, because if he did it wouldn't have been helpful to her case. By the way did anyone catch a look at her face when he made the "other" personality disorder comment. I have a feeling JA wouldn't "likey" that answer.
I think the very least we can assume is that this jury is not dim witted and there will be a fair verdict. I pray it's the right one, but with some of the astute minds on this jury and JM at the helm, this is the very best shot TA has at justice. I almost feel bad for JA, not for the justice here, but for what's waiting for her on the other side.
She's just upset because there are no JA ribbons! Who would wear one willingly?!? :twocents: