"30% of people convicted of homicide report amnesia" So, what purpose does the 'doctors' testimony have now? Wouldn't his testimony be more relevant when she's convicted?
....Can't say she did not lie, but base on the consistencies in her stories, he can draw on his 35 years of experience to determine what happened......(paraphrasing here)
... Yes, she told stories, but once her story changed I rely on my experience to determine the probability.....(again paraphrased, by me)
Is he even listening to his own words? He contradicts himself constantly.