This is what I believed- they gave her limited info- she doesn't have the :banghead:whole picture for her "contexts"
Maybe she's just bad at statistics... nah, I watched her youtube video so I have a better idea how she views the world around her.
This is what I believed- they gave her limited info- she doesn't have the :banghead:whole picture for her "contexts"
Somethings been bugging me.
Travis was abused as a child.
Couldn't he be more likely to put up with abuse from JA (mental and physical) because of all he suffered as a child?
Somethings been bugging me.
Travis was abused as a child.
Couldn't he be more likely to put up with abuse from JA (mental and physical) because of all he suffered as a child?
See - she's saying she only reviewed what was provided to her.
Here's what I think happened: When ALV was approached by defense, she was first given very limited information, all of it showing Travis in a very bad light, and showing Jodi in a favorable light. They were priming the pump to bias ALV and get her to conclude Travis was abusive so that any further information she was provided would be tainted with her conclusion that Travis was an abuser.
If this was the case, then I think that she actually believes most of what she is saying and really does have a very distorted view of the whole deal. To this day, Alyce still only has very limited information, and she does not have a clue about all the psycho things Jodi has said and done.
All this time, I had assumed that Alyce had read ALL the journal entries ,ALL the text messages, ALL the emails, etc, but that's not the case. Alyce was not privy to all the testimony that came before her, so she came into her testimony without the benefit of a complete picture. It would explain why she says she hasn't seen anything showing that Jodi was jealous or anything to indicate Jodi was manipulative. She literally has not seen that information.
She really didn't stand for the jury? If so, that shows her true personality. She didn't like the questions, so she doesn't like the jury and she'll show them who is in charge.
BRAVO!!!! POST OF THE DAY, IMO!! The jurors are permitted to CONTINUE asking questions, so I'm convinced where she's deliberately answered vaguely - they'll demand clarification! I'm so happy for Tenisha, Samantha, Stephen & the whole family!!! Finally, sort of a good day...
Not a full day Sophie. . .court is scheduled to convene @ 9:30am - 12:30pm, better 3 hours than none, as court is usually dark on Fridays.
The bailiff watching her closely
And they only know about 60% of what we know. They STILL get it.
She's made threats or something. They don't ratchet that stuff up suddenly for nothing.
JA's personal deputy was standing right on top of her...JA looked PO'd!
wonder if the jail is having "problems" with her?
I Love this jury!
ALV was obviously duped by the defendant, and the defense team did not provide her with everything that she needed to conduct a thorough analysis of her client. When ALV has finished testifying, do you think that she will look more deeply into the case to find the evidence that was not presented to her?