katiedid2
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2010
- Messages
- 4,092
- Reaction score
- 0
IMO as to jodi's positioning and distance from TRavis when she took that photo.
Am with you I'm still shaking my head.
IMO as to jodi's positioning and distance from TRavis when she took that photo.
IMO as to jodi's positioning and distance from TRavis when she took that photo.
This is so unbelievable! Let's bring in experts regarding the "hand on the naughty part" as well, why don't we?
This is nothing more than stretching like a Rorschach test. This is speculation of the nth degree.
I want to pull my hair out. Do we have a hair pulling emoticon?
Seriously, this is why DP cases get ca-razy. They get far too much latitude...much more than LWOP. It's obscense. If this evidence was entered, it would be so prejudicial against the State. It would insert a level of reasonable doubt that is based on speculation so inconsistent with the evidence. I just can't believe this is happening.
If I didn't have such confidence in Juan to rebut this carp, I would literally be pulling out my own teeth.
Well, according to his outline...she was standing...she testified that she was kneeling.
I missed the big moment :banghead:
So what is the point???
It might be a woman wearing a scarf, or an old crone . . . No wait, it's a vase, or maybe two faces . . .
Breaking news: he sees someone taking a picture