trial day 48: REBUTTAL #146

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL. I wish I had some popcorn or something! Would go perfect with the comedy of watching Jodi pretend all busy and professional at the D table. It's comical.. truly!
 
It looks like Jodi knows what's coming and is about to fall apart.
Good.
 
Jodi can't sharpen her own pencil?? What the hell is going on with her today?

she got in some sort of trouble with that last week... (unknown what was going on but ever since the guard is on her and she is not allowed to sharpen her own pencils.. could it have something to do with hiding pens in her shampoo? hmmm? Either way she had a pencil stuffed in her shoe yesterday and I hope someone reported that)
 
Hey Dr D is flirting with my man!!!
Lol

Its okay...she's allowed :loveyou:
 
I am kind of looking forward to JW's cross. Time for a little comic relief. :giggle:

It's gonna be a train wreck.
JW needs to tread carefully ... But I don't see that happening.
Too many "objection, knowledge" ( over ruled of course) from JW.
I think the jury appreciates Dr DeMarte's professionalism and JW trying to discredit her - will NOT go over well with the jury.

Such a HUGE visible difference in the psych experts that the defense put up on the stand versus Dr DeMarte.
Striking difference.
 
JA is threatened by DD. That's why no glasses today. She's pretty, and smart. And JA hates it. To her core.
 
OMG, I just went out to the grocery store and there were 4 Alyce LaV look-alikes in there and one lady who looked like JA's mother. (they're invading Canada)
 
If they do, they will probably be really asking sincere questions that they want intelligent answers to. I doubt they will ask any sarcastic rude ones, like the previous two 'experts' were given.
While I'm sure Juan will continue to do an excellent job of shredding Jodi's defense & lies via Dr. DeMarte's testimony, it's possible the jury may have questions about specific claims that Jodi made and how they relate to the doctor's findings. I don't see that as a bad thing in this case.
 
Jodi puts glasses on for jury but removes them to go back to playing school.
 
The defence to this case is to the prosecution as night is to day.

I am impressed with this witness.

I must admit though, when the defence team get a chance to question her I'd just love it if she then started giving long winded/rediculous answers and doing her very best not to say yes or no.



When the Defense finally cross-exams this women they will go down in litigating history as legendary fools!

How can anyone successfully butt heads with truth? That is something the DT has no practice in seeing they've bent it for 48 days for a client who has avoided it for 5 nearly years!
 
I've been a lurker for a LONG time...since Scott Peterson case.
You all have keep me informed for a eternity lol. Thanks!

Have we had any reports of any jury questions being tossed in the basket this morning?
 
...BPD! And the hits just keep on coming. Spin it, Doc!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
247
Total visitors
393

Forum statistics

Threads
608,475
Messages
18,240,012
Members
234,385
Latest member
johnwich
Back
Top