Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My educated guess would be that IF she is in the courtroom she will not be able to 'rebuke the rebuttal witness' in a cross of the direct of the rebuttal or whatever the technical legal terms are for this stuff LOL!
Ahhh yess see that IQ of mine burning in circles?
Sidenote an IQ is only as good as the information/knowledge you have.. it's kinda like the processor in your PC.. you may have a superfast processor but not enough programs or data stored where someone else may have a slower process but better programs & data stored therefore it provides better reporting... If that makes sense?
Don't get down on what your IQ is or isn't because there are alot of 'book smart' people out there that couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag because they are too busy analyzing approaches amount of force or identifying the weakest area of the bag where some of us say Hell with it.. Rip!
JMO
Slightly O/T...Now that we're on lunch break...quick question. Does anyone know how to have two tabs open on an ipad and move back and forth from watching the trial and web sleuths? Every time I switch it stops the live feed?
Any help is greatly appreciated...it's driving me batty!! Thnx!
It sounds like another doctor who evaluated her. I wonder why they decided not to call her or did the expert change her mind when she learned JA had based her answers on lies?
At the end of rebuttal, the defense may be allowed surrebuttal. Surrebuttal evidence is limited to responding to issues that were raised for the first time in the rebuttal case. It is not an opportunity for the defense to present their whole case again, or to open up the door to new issues.
FINALLY sanity prevails!! We have here a beautiful, articulate, UNBIASED scientist who is not going to freak out on cross examination.
She found Jodi to be disordered. I LOVE IT.
I know Jodi is highly agitated and rageful right now due to her little act of pretending that she wasn't even listening. We know that she was listening to each and every syllable since it was about her favorite subject--Jodi Arias.
I hope she has a hard time swallowing her peanut butter! Time to face up to your own psychological disorders and the cold blooded murder you committed, Jodi.
She can and I heard she was. That's gotta' sting!!!
In fact, I heard she was actually in the courtroom but I never saw a photo or video of her.
This DEmarte shows that while Ms. Laviolette is great in lecturing about domestic violence and conducting group therapy, she has no business evaluating anyone. Her business itself renders her supremely biased and she lacks the training or education to be able to conduct a valid assessment.
So we have a marriage and family counselor who lectures about domestic violence, counsels abusers and appears very, defensively biased against men, or towards viewing women as victims, and a Dr. who conducted shoddy, suspect testing, gifted books to his test subject, and was befuddled, defensive and disorganized, unable to provide raw data to back up his opinion, versus a collected, organized Ph.D., who can immediately provide the raw data to back up her opinion, whose training and education support her ability to evaluate the subject and whose testing protocols are clearly objective, and appropriate.
I wonder who wins?
Oh, I just got it. She is copying the bible. Like a medieval monk.
Slightly O/T...Now that we're on lunch break...quick question. Does anyone know how to have two tabs open on an ipad and move back and forth from watching the trial and web sleuths? Every time I switch it stops the live feed?
Any help is greatly appreciated...it's driving me batty!! Thnx!
I would like to be a fly in JA's brain... I can't imagine what she must be thinking..."I'm doomed"..."I'm doomed"..."I'm doomed"..."I'm doomed"....I wonder...
Exactly. That's why we are all so happy today. Because now we can see what true communication looks like, and we no longer feel crazy.
ALV and Samuels were crazymakers, acting like others are not smart enough to realize they are not getting answers to the questions they are being asked. ALV much worse than Samuels though. I think ALV is a master at it.
The tremendous sigh of relief sent up by websleuths today because we all felt SANE again.
According to Dr. DeMarte, Jodi reported only four "incidents" of domestic violence to her, Dr. Samuels, and Alyce LaViolette, yet significantly more to Dr. Carp. Sounds like the defense instructed JA to dial it back for the purposes of the trial--perhaps in an attempt to make it somehow more believable to one or more of the jurors. The trashing of Travis and what she (Samuels and ALV) testified to was bad enough, but I can only imagine how much worse it could have been had she been able to go full bore with all her BS.
Is the afternoon session going to start at the usual 1:30ish AZ time today?? I missed most of the am session whilst babysitting. I am going to try to plan GSon's nap accordingly. TIA
To have an intelligent, respectful expert witness who when asked a yes or no question, answers with a yes or a no, period. :great:
With that ALV character JM would ask her the time and she'd tell him how to build a clock. :banghead:
GO JUAN:rocker:
GODSPEED TO JUSTICE FOR TRAVISlease:
Great post!
BBM - That's the problem with people like JA; they don't walk in reality. They're so difficult to treat because it's always somebody else's fault. People like ALV (and oftentimes parents), who make excuses for their behavior, do them a great disservice. Like you pointed out, it irritates or enrages people like JA when somebody points out the ugly truth about them.