I think at this point the jury would have to have a remarkable and illogical belief in coincidences. Jodi would just have to be the most unlucky woman in the world for all this to stack up against her, pointing to premeditation. I mean, of aaalllll the returns that happened that day Jodi's is the one that doesn't show up? And that doesn't even explain the third gas purchase.
This jury isn't stupid.
Juan didn't explore a void possibility because it doesn't make sense. They would not void transaction hours later.
Actually, what I was trying to say is that it is only a void BEFORE the transaction is finalized and paid for. You can't void a transaction that has already been closed. You would have to process it as a return. Once the transaction is rung up, you can't void it anymore. So there is no need to even talk about the voids because there is no way that a "void" transaction for the gas can could have happened here.