Absolutely fantastic suggestion! Thank you!
Re, what she was wearing that day: IIRC, a pink tee and shorts. Don't know the color of the shorts. Still not 100% clear whether those were found yet or not.
(There was reference to her "clothes" being wet when she was found, but she was found wearing purple panties.....ugh, just had a thought - hope that was what she left in based on SW @ TH's - anyway.......nothing clear as to whether "clothes" meant only the panties or that the rest of her outfit was with her).
We don't know the reasons why mom did not go for child support earlier.
My opinion is if you play, you pay.
Having sex has results sometimes.
There is a sonic not far from Saginaw that doesn't have carhops. It only has a drive through, and is eat in. It's so weird, and the only one I've seen like that.
Dos that not apply to her, as well? It's her body, she can use birth control. If he REALLY didn't know that there was a son out there...why should he have to pay back support? Because, he didn't use protection? Well, that goes both ways. She didn't use protection either, and could have filed right away. Women either want equal rights, or they want special treatment. We can't have it both ways. Equal rights says, that she is EQUALLY responsible, and she failed to be responsible and report that he had a child. In her case, I don't think she deserves the back support.
In fact I think she violated HIS rights as a father, by not sharing this information to him. It seems like she only shared when she wanted the money.
Boyd Texas where mom was living with TH as a youngster has only 1350 people. I would thnk someone would notice she was pregnant and mention it to her ex bf?
I think the father has known for at least 4 years. I wonder why he did not sue for visitation?
It is curious to me why the search warrant would say female child clothing instead of identifying the actual clothing.
Perhaps none of the parents were exactly sure what she was wearing that day?
I believe child support is for the child?
We do not know why she did not ask for support before. Maybe he flew under the radar. No job so he could not be traced . Maybe he had other issues. We do not know.
My husband had a business and he often had to take child support out of guy's paychecks. Oh how they would whine. They were not happy about giving money to the women. Um. It is for the child, housing, food , clothing , etc.
A pink tshirt? I wonder if I can change my user name so I can have a different persona. This one does not feel ok anymore (just saw the watch on Dora's wrist too.) Anyone know?
Where is it? The only ones I have seen around here are the normal kind.
Yes, he will have to pay it all back. Tyler can be 30 years old and the dad still may be paying the back child support because he also has to pay current child support as well until Tyler turns 18.
Which is awful imo since he didn't even know he had a child in the first place.
If he had known he was a dad to TH when he was born maybe TH wouldn't have turned out the way he has.
Often it is way too late for a relationship when so many years have past.
I feel sorry for this father.
He wanted to have a relationship with Tyler once he found out he had a son. Now all Tyler has done is brought him misery, shame, and pain.
Geisen said he is continuing to pay back child support for his son but after hearing of Holders charges, is no longer interested in meeting him.
If those accusations are true, I dont even want to acknowledge that he is my son, Geisen said.
I don't feel sorry for him at all. He helped create the child. At least TH's mom was trying to see him after all of this. I think most parents would be horrified but would still love their child.
Glenn Geisen says...
http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/07/29/5038936/arlington-officer-shot-during.html
I don't think that means he doesn't love him, necessarily. It's possible to love someone, and not have anything to do with them. I love my sister, but she did some horrible things. She is no part of my life, but I do love her.
Love, acceptance, and acknowledgement can all stand alone. They are not mutually exclusive.
We also don't know her motivations. She could be motivated by guilt, denial, and shock...more then love. (I'm in no way saying she is, but we don't know her motivations or intentions.)
I'm not completely sticking up for the dad. I'm sure he's made his fair share of mistakes, as well. However, people say stupid things in grief. He might not have even meant it. If he did, we should not assume he doesn't have love.
Of course you're right Blue, he could love him. I have a hard time understanding that since he hasn't met him.
She on the other hand, changed his diapers and kissed his booboos. Even if she knew he wasn't turning out the way she hoped, she must be completely devastated.
Of course, it's for the child. However, the money is facilitated through the parent. Ultimately, the money goes to parent for the child, and hopefully they actually use it that way.
Like I said, she had 15 years to ask for support. I don't think women should be able to snap their fingers, and get years and thousands of back support. It's on THEM if they don't ask. Unless a gun is held to their head or they feel in danger of asking, it's her fault those years were not paid into.
*Not that I'm blaming her for wanting support for the child. I'm not, at all. I just don't think it's a good system to force people to back pay, for a child they were not even aware of. They are being punished financially, for knowlege they didn't have. I DO think they should be held financially responsible, but should not have to pay back 15 years they didn't know about.
I don't know about the Mom to like or dislike her. I want to know what she knew and when. I want to know if she knew what was going on in her home. Certainly, I want to know if TH had accomplice and how in the hello that beautiful girl ended up in the gutter. :furious: