mickey2942
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2016
- Messages
- 14,412
- Reaction score
- 137,289
I actually would not believe the toxicology results if they are negative. If I was Mr. Jean's attorney I would want a DNA match on the blood.
Exactly?!Following Merritt’s meeting with the district attorney, he decided against releasing the new evidence he believes will lead to Guyger’s arrest.
He said they “brought forward a witness and video evidence, not of the shooting itself” and that the narrative pushed by DPD is challenged by the evidence they presented.
“Which is why they pulled back on the warrant,” he said. “We know she (Guyger) used her service weapon ... when people saw her in the public, they believed she was a police officer ... for us, it enhances the culpability.
Off-duty Dallas police officer charged in shooting death of unarmed Botham Shem Jean
Not according to Texas's legal definition of "home invasion." IF she can convince a jury that she mistakenly walked through an unlocked, partly opened door that she honestly presumed was her own residence and subsequently shot, in the dark, a person she thought was an intruder, the charge would be trespass resulting in accidental death.So what happened to all those reports that she tried to enter with her key and he opened the door and she shot him twice in the chest. If she indeed enter his apartment through an unlocked door, it is a home invasion on her part. Nothing she did makes her less guilty, whether through stupidity or a sense of entitlement on her part
But why not try to do something different than shooting first? Doesn't she have a lot of training for all different kinds of situations? This whole thing is such a sad deal.
Do you have a link to your statement that there is such a charge as 'trespass resulting in accidental death' that would pertain to the person who lived in the home dying . Thanks.Not according to Texas's legal definition of "home invasion." IF she can convince a jury that she mistakenly walked through an unlocked, partly opened door that she honestly presumed was her own residence and subsequently shot, in the dark, a person she thought was an intruder, the charge would be trespass resulting in accidental death.
We simply don't have enough facts to know what really happened here. I agree it looks very bad for her and the scenario I painted above is highly unlikely, but let's not put her neck in a noose just yet. Even the guiltiest-looking defendant deserves her day in court.
-AC
She's 30 yrs old. Her family isn't responsible for what she did.If her family is affluent to have bailed her out for the $300K bail, they may very well get ready for a huge civil wrongful death lawsuit
And the Dallas LE may get sued, too
I don't think that they had real story then.
Neighbors and forensics will be able to verify much more information, even though the victim can't speak. But all we know now is that Guyger is the killer, not necessarily a murderer. There's a huge legal distinction between the two terms. Nor do we know whether she is a criminal. Heck, she's not even an alleged criminal yet because the Texas Rangers haven't finished their investigation. Let's wait at least 48 hours before sending the posse out to lynch her. My point is that criminal trials are full of surprises and there's plenty of fact-finding left in this case. Murder, manslaughter, accidental death? Burglary, home invasion, trespass? Hundreds of other questions are still up in the air. Let's give her her day in court, and IF she's found guilty of murder 1, I'll be happy to place the noose on her myself. But if there are verifiable, extenuating circumstances that significantly decrease her culpability, the jury will take those into account when reaching a verdict, as will the judge at sentencing.And who knows if this is the "real" story? The killer is telling it. The other person who could verify the information is dead.
I am skeptical about anything I hear from a murderer, that cannot be corroborated with actual evidence. A criminal will say anything to make herself seem more sympathetic.
*SBM*Heck, she's not even an alleged criminal yet because the Texas Rangers haven't finished their investigation.
-AC
In fact, in most US states you, the homeowner or apartment dweller, are legally allowed to shoot and kill anyone who has illegally entered your home if you have reasonable grounds for believing the intruder to be a threat to your life. If my husband were away and I came face-to-face with an intruder in our darkened home, I would unload a clip on the *advertiser censored* faster than he could say, "But burglary is not a capital offense." Then I'd sue his next of kin for the cost to clean my rugs.Burglary is not a capital offense the last I heard. If you think there is a burglar in your apartment you leave and call for help. You don’t start shooting!
For example...I came home from picking our daughter up at school one afternoon years ago, and when I walked in the door to our house, which was in the middle of 10 acres of forest, I could tell instantly that stuff was missing. I didn’t know if the burglar was still there. I grabbed my 6 year old daughter, ran out the door, got back in the car and gunned it down our long driveway...out of harm’s way. It turned out that all three of them were gone, but even if they had still been there and I’d seen them and had a gun, shooting would not enter my mind unless there was a clear threat to our lives. Since when are possessions worth more than a human life, even a criminal’s? Not in my world.