Found Deceased TX - Caleb Harris, 21, Texas A&M University student, Corpus Christi, 4 Mar 2024 #4

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
At the beginning I honestly thought he was murdered, considering the rumors of a hookup. But it's clear the police used all their resources and more for the digital investigation and it didn't reveal anything. If it was murder, the murderer would have to be very knowledgeable about digital footprints.
Or the murderer had no need of digital footprints at all because that's not why/how the encounter transpired. JMO.

Don't get me wrong. I don't  need or  want to believe that Caleb Harris was murdered. I'm not invested in that being the only outcome. But it absolutely strains credulity to have to accept the alternative because it is just so astronomically unlikely, IMO.

When I was a kid, a boy down the road from my rural home was pulled into a metal shredder in his family's professional junkyard. It was a freak accident that reverberated for years in our small town. A year or so later, another young boy was killed when playing under a two-lane bridge that crossed a thin creek. He wasn't found for some time because it took however long for LE to determine that he had been smothered beneath by a cascade of wet, muddy dirt that had been dislodged by a large truck that had exceeded weight limits. That was another freak accident that lingered, for sure.

So I do understand and accept that freak accidents happen, and some of them have no witnesses at all, yet can be fully solved, in time, with reverse engineering. What I really cannot fathom here are the odds of the following:

Caleb and his phone accidentally fell into that crop field manhole,
and he was injured in the fall to the extent that he could not cry out or dial out,
and he remained inert in that manhole until decomposition made it possible for his remains to drift (weeks?, months?),
and that field had been searched,
and he and his phone and that manhole were missed again and again until April 18th, when LE responded to the report of the open manhole,
and no evidence of him or his phone were then found there,
and he ended up passing through narrow pipes into a well some distance away but then couldn't pass beyond it into outgoing pipes and instead remained there, suspended in liquid, eventually hanging up on the pump and triggering the alarm which prompted discovery.

Are the odds of all of that really lower than that of an opportunistic predator noticing a barefoot young man apparently loitering near a foggy bridge at 3:00 in the morning? IMO, they're not.
 
Or the murderer had no need of digital footprints at all because that's not why/how the encounter transpired. JMO.

Don't get me wrong. I don't  need or  want to believe that Caleb Harris was murdered. I'm not invested in that being the only outcome. But it absolutely strains credulity to have to accept the alternative because it is just so astronomically unlikely, IMO.

When I was a kid, a boy down the road from my rural home was pulled into a metal shredder in his family's professional junkyard. It was a freak accident that reverberated for years in our small town. A year or so later, another young boy was killed when playing under a two-lane bridge that crossed a thin creek. He wasn't found for some time because it took however long for LE to determine that he had been smothered beneath by a cascade of wet, muddy dirt that had been dislodged by a large truck that had exceeded weight limits. That was another freak accident that lingered, for sure.

So I do understand and accept that freak accidents happen, and some of them have no witnesses at all, yet can be fully solved, in time, with reverse engineering. What I really cannot fathom here are the odds of the following:

Caleb and his phone accidentally fell into that crop field manhole,
and he was injured in the fall to the extent that he could not cry out or dial out,
and he remained inert in that manhole until decomposition made it possible for his remains to drift (weeks?, months?),
and that field had been searched,
and he and his phone and that manhole were missed again and again until April 18th, when LE responded to the report of the open manhole,
and no evidence of him or his phone were then found there,
and he ended up passing through narrow pipes into a well some distance away but then couldn't pass beyond it into outgoing pipes and instead remained there, suspended in liquid, eventually hanging up on the pump and triggering the alarm which prompted discovery.

Are the odds of all of that really lower than that of an opportunistic predator noticing a barefoot young man apparently loitering near a foggy bridge at 3:00 in the morning? IMO, they're not.
Definitely food for thought.
So an opportunistic predator who happens upon him is an alternative to the online hookup scenario, and would not involve online communication.
The question is, if this occurred, how would it ever be found out and proven definitively?
 
It’s interesting (frustrating?) that with all the coverage Caleb’s disappearance has received, no one seems to have actually gone to the field, walked around, looked at the manhole cover. I mean, obviously I would expect (hope!) it’s been repaired now, but even just seeing the area and repaired cover, it would make the situation so much easier to imagine. It’s right off the road and doesn’t seem fenced in. I recognise it’s private property, but there are YouTubers sniffing around all sorts of places. Just sort of thinking aloud really, MOO.
I recently stopped by the area on Sunday the 25th of August. I posted some of my thoughts on Wednesday the 28th of August at about 9:30 AM. My visit left me probably more perplexed than I was before.
 
So I do understand and accept that freak accidents happen, and some of them have no witnesses at all, yet can be fully solved, in time, with reverse engineering. What I really cannot fathom here are the odds of the following:

Caleb and his phone accidentally fell into that crop field manhole,
and he was injured in the fall to the extent that he could not cry out or dial out,
and he remained inert in that manhole until decomposition made it possible for his remains to drift (weeks?, months?),
and that field had been searched,
and he and his phone and that manhole were missed again and again until April 18th, when LE responded to the report of the open manhole,
and no evidence of him or his phone were then found there,
and he ended up passing through narrow pipes into a well some distance away but then couldn't pass beyond it into outgoing pipes and instead remained there, suspended in liquid, eventually hanging up on the pump and triggering the alarm which prompted discovery.

Are the odds of all of that really lower than that of an opportunistic predator noticing a barefoot young man apparently loitering near a foggy bridge at 3:00 in the morning? IMO, they're not.

(Snipped) We don't even have idea of how, where, or even when Caleb met his end. That's where I was thinking out loud, like, either scenario is really quite full of giant holes that you can drive a truck through.

An accident lines up with some things but not all. If there's one thing I'm more sure of, if there is a third party involved, a secret meet-up is at least part of the scenario. I really cannot imagine a scenario where a random predator attacks a victim and their phone is off. People are glued to their phones. Caleb had just ordered food on his phone and had just sent a Snap at night to someone. I can't imagine any scenario where his phone would be off - which is why I think falling accidentally into water makes more sense.

The recent Coffindaffer interview with Caleb’s Dad is on her own X and YouTube channels (and thus can’t be posted here).
Usually WS does allow interviews when it's the family of the missing/deceased person. PM a mod/admin, and they will post if it's allowed or not.
 
I keep wondering if the apartment door was left open/ajar a bit.

Hypothetical:

Let's say Caleb had taken the dog out to potty. He may not have wanted to bother taking his apartment key for such a quick thing, so he could've left the door cracked a bit. The dog may have taken off running for some reason. Caleb might've ran after the dog and, in the fog and darkness, accidentally fell into the manhole. The dog could've made its way back to the apartment, and pushed or pawed the cracked door open enough to get inside.

And some doors are heavy enough to close and latch themselves, so even if the door wasn't found ajar, maybe it was heavy enough to latch itself after the dog let itself back in.

Could it be something this simple?
 
I keep wondering if the apartment door was left open/ajar a bit.

Hypothetical:

Let's say Caleb had taken the dog out to potty. He may not have wanted to bother taking his apartment key for such a quick thing, so he could've left the door cracked a bit. The dog may have taken off running for some reason. Caleb might've ran after the dog and, in the fog and darkness, accidentally fell into the manhole. The dog could've made its way back to the apartment, and pushed or pawed the cracked door open enough to get inside.

And some doors are heavy enough to close and latch themselves, so even if the door wasn't found ajar, maybe it was heavy enough to latch itself after the dog let itself back in.

Could it be something this simple?
Every scenario is worth consideration at this point, IMO. Since Jenny the dog was new to Caleb and his roommates as of that very night, I do have doubts that she could have found her way back to a place that was also brand new to her.

I wonder if the roommates kept her.
 
(Snipped) We don't even have idea of how, where, or even when Caleb met his end. That's where I was thinking out loud, like, either scenario is really quite full of giant holes that you can drive a truck through.

An accident lines up with some things but not all. If there's one thing I'm more sure of, if there is a third party involved, a secret meet-up is at least part of the scenario. I really cannot imagine a scenario where a random predator attacks a victim and their phone is off. People are glued to their phones. Caleb had just ordered food on his phone and had just sent a Snap at night to someone. I can't imagine any scenario where his phone would be off - which is why I think falling accidentally into water makes more sense.
(Also snipped)

Completely agree we can drive a big rig through the holes in this case.

Caleb may not have turned his phone off, but an attacker very well could have and also taken it with. Recall the odd and largely dismissed 3:12 a.m. "final" ping, for example.
 
“A group of retired law enforcement agents are taking a closer look at the death of a college student from New Braunfels.”


“Peña is leading a group of about 10 retired law enforcement agents and psychologists helping Harris's family find answers. They are working pro bono and meet weekly, Peña says.
“People want to know, 'How did Caleb die?'" said Peña. "How did he wind up in that treatment facility there?”
Tips have been pouring into Peña's nonprofit, Project Absentis.
Some online chat groups have speculated Harris may have been speaking with someone the morning he went missing and was making plans to meet up. Peña is aware of the rumors.
“We have examined a number of tips related to that," he said. "I have been given a number of people to talk to by an individual—as a matter of fact, today. I would say at this point they are decent leads. Not fully credible, but we are still vetting this and are hopeful that we get some answers soon.””

 
“A group of retired law enforcement agents are taking a closer look at the death of a college student from New Braunfels.”


“Peña is leading a group of about 10 retired law enforcement agents and psychologists helping Harris's family find answers. They are working pro bono and meet weekly, Peña says.
“People want to know, 'How did Caleb die?'" said Peña. "How did he wind up in that treatment facility there?”
Tips have been pouring into Peña's nonprofit, Project Absentis.
Some online chat groups have speculated Harris may have been speaking with someone the morning he went missing and was making plans to meet up. Peña is aware of the rumors.
“We have examined a number of tips related to that," he said. "I have been given a number of people to talk to by an individual—as a matter of fact, today. I would say at this point they are decent leads. Not fully credible, but we are still vetting this and are hopeful that we get some answers soon.””

Well, it’s good to hear that all angles are being explored, then. Definitely.
 
Even if Caleb was speaking with someone, it doesn't mean that his death couldn't have been accidental. It would be interesting to know if he met up with someone that morning or if he never made it to his destination. Glad that there's someone new looking into it either way.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
187
Guests online
4,096
Total visitors
4,283

Forum statistics

Threads
603,117
Messages
18,152,289
Members
231,648
Latest member
jangelyn
Back
Top