Oh absolutely that is the official reason.. just wondering how many other managers "use" phones & it is overlooked..
The reason I wonder if other managers 'borrow' phones is because everyone seems to know that EA did!
Plus, why promote EA to manager to begin with if he was a dishonest employee?
The same employee should have reported him earlier if EA's borrowing was out of line.
It bugs me for someone, a co-worker or an employee who didn't get the promotion?, to expound upon an unrelated minor offense because they just want to talk dirt.
Not meaning the subject of the gold phone but the phone thing overall (if they knew about it all along but did nothing about it earlier).
Regardless, the managerial job (according to a co-worker) wasn't agreeing with EA.
Maybe he wasn't performing well in the job.
How does the subject help our understanding of what happened to Christina?
It would help to know if EA took phones before, when he put them back, did he wipe them or reset them?
Not sure I understand the difference but know somebody mentioned the subject earlier.
LE said the gold phone had been wiped (a computer may have performed the task therefore LE may be able to recover the wiped data).
Would wiping a "borrowed" phone be an easier process prior to returning it to the store?
Would a buyer know if a phone had been wiped or reset?
When a phone is purchased, is info that is supposed to be there eliminated too when wiped?
