If the machine is 99% right (I don't believe that they are that accurate), wouldn't it suck to be a 1%'er if it meant prison? Luckily, I don't believe that a failed LE test would be admissible in court. I'm uncertain how lie detector might be used except as to flag someone in the eyes of LE as untruthful. It would still suck to be a 1%'er if it places you in the crosshairs of LE. I would decline every time.
With all due respect, I'm not referring to my wife & me.. I'm talking about an unstable young couple that ARE NOT married & were arguing. Just because they have 2 dogs doesn't mean jack (imo).. I also stated that I didn't know what their particular relationship was like and if that would be unusual for them (cause I don't know)... With that said, it would be odd for a NORMAL couple to lose contact like that.. (just to clarify)..eace:
I think we'll just disagree on this, but that's cool, I don't mind different opinions. To answer your question though, it's the 1% problem (or whatever the error rate is). Odds are that it would be accurate, but if I bucked the odds then the consequences would be unacceptable. Especially for a voluntary test. We're innocent until proven guilty, I'll choose to maintain that status instead of helping to change the status to guilty.
When I used to go to Greenville regularly, I used to catch 380 across from McKinney
