Jeana (DP)
Former Member
The problem is the wording. Yes, she knew the difference between right and wrong. In more "enlightened" states, the wording is more along the lines of "was the mental illness of the defendant the DECIDING FACTOR in the cime." In other words, would the crime have occurred had the defendant NOT been mentally ill. In this case, of course not. Don't get bogged down by legal terms. If Andrea wasn't mentally ill or had she received adequate treatment, those children would still be alive.