"...
LE a knowledge early on that, while they believe dogs tracked him to the abandoned house and the nearby pond, they can't be certain WHOSE path the dogs followed. Could be Jason's, could be law enforcement's..."
BBM
@Megnut, wrote the above, Post #492 Thread #2.
Because of
@Megnut's credibility as one of our top sleuths, I'm certain there would be a link from which this information is taken.
IMO, finding items belonging to Jason at the crash scene doesn't prove he himself was ever at the scene.
And if it's true that LE
can't be certain WHOSE path the dogs followed. Could be Jason's, could be law enforcement's.", what do we think of the following notion:
Jason's vehicle was stopped by someone – flagged down, a road rage incident, car-jacking – during the 67 minutes for which there is no recorded activity, and as a result, Jason was harmed by one or more perpetrators.
For example, two people apprehended Jason during the 67-minute gap. One continued on to the crash scene in Jason's vehicle, followed by the other perp. driving his/her vehicle, in which an injured or deceased victim was transported, and Jason's vehicle was abandoned there, after placing some of his belongings on the road, and both perps continued on in their vehicle.
Questions:
1. Reportedly, Jason's vehicle was found on a gravel road. Did LE therefore identify how many vehicle tracks, and from what tire treads, and how many footprints were in the vicinity of Jason's damaged vehicle when they arrived on the scene, and were these potential findings examined forensically?
2. Has LE interviewed past clients of Jason's dad from when he was an attorney, who may have had reasons to be disgruntled?
3. Surely the firefighter who reportedly found Jason's vehicle has been interviewed. Why have we heard nothing about what statement he may have made? Why have we heard so little at all, for so long?