butwhatif?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reaction score
- 40
This is not about other soldiers having to tread lightly because of his religion and not reporting their concerns.
Surely this was a HUGE red flag to his superiors....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/06/AR2009110600907.html
And this HUGE red flag that the authorities knew about 6 months ago!
He even hired a lawyer to try to get a discharge and offered to pay back the money for his medical training- but still they kept him.This info comes from his family who are NOT defending his actions. The officials will not confirm or deny it at this point.
Why was he not discharged? And if he had been discharged would this have happened? Would have have still gone on a bloody rampage?
Should anybody in the armed forces be forced to stay against their will regardless of race, religion and political beliefs?
And the ones that do request a discharge should not be called cowards, or guilted, or forced into staying.
I know they are desperate for manpower , but at what expense?
JMO
Surely this was a HUGE red flag to his superiors....
Benyedder said there was no signs of anger or frustration from Hasan during his years at the mosque, but recalled that Hasan sought the advice of a few Muslim brothers regarding a presentation he had been preparing to give to his superiors in the Army. Part of the presentation included the argument that the Army should release a soldier from duty if his religion prevented him from actions and orders by the army, Benyedder recalled.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/06/AR2009110600907.html
And this HUGE red flag that the authorities knew about 6 months ago!
The Associated Press reported that Hasan attracted the attention of law enforcement authorities in recent months after an Internet posting under the screen name "NidalHasan" compared Islamic suicide bombers to Japanese kamikaze pilots. "To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate," the posting read. "It's more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause."
He even hired a lawyer to try to get a discharge and offered to pay back the money for his medical training- but still they kept him.This info comes from his family who are NOT defending his actions. The officials will not confirm or deny it at this point.
Why was he not discharged? And if he had been discharged would this have happened? Would have have still gone on a bloody rampage?
Should anybody in the armed forces be forced to stay against their will regardless of race, religion and political beliefs?
And the ones that do request a discharge should not be called cowards, or guilted, or forced into staying.
I know they are desperate for manpower , but at what expense?
JMO