Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s still a thing, but only in the most technical sense. Temporary promotions can only take place during specifically designated time periods, and the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Army is the person that decides this. It is highly unlikely it will ever be invoked again unless there is a dire shortage of people (and even then I’m not so sure), given the changes in the promotion system that have occurred over the last decade. As I stated earlier, corporals are exactly what that rank was supposed to convey, so there is absolutely no reason for temporary promotions anymore. If a specialist needs to fill an E5 slot, they will receive a lateral promotion to corporal, which designates them as an NCO and technically superior to a specialist (even though they are the same pay grade). If he were promoted into some sort of NCO role, it would be apparent because he would be identified as either a SGT or a CPL. There’s really nothing to back up this theory.When were acting jack E5 segeants eliminated?
"In order to get geolocation data for a phone, or cell tower data, you need a warrant. For a warrant, you have to have probable cause you suspect someone committed the crime"They had access to what phone? In order to get geolocation data for a phone, or cell tower data, you need a warrant. For a warrant, you have to have probable cause you suspect someone committed the crime. Being the last person to see someone wouldn’t necessarily meet the probable cause threshold.
A lot of people here seem to forget or are unaware that they made two attempts on separate days to render the body unidentifiable. It is likely she was identifiable (but deceased) when she was taken to the burial site, and was then... I don’t even know what to call it. Poor girl.
The affidavit explicitly states they are revealing only enough information to meet the probable cause threshold for an arrest warrant to be taken out. Her confessing to this stuff easily meets and exceeds probable cause, so that’s what they used.
He was not her supervisor. I’m not sure where this idea came from. They weren’t even in the same company. This is apparent from the affidavit.
Who says they were not appropriately-ranked personnel? They were unit armorers. It was their job to have access to the arms room. The base was on limited duty at the time though, yes, due to COVID. That would be why more people weren’t around. I would not/do not find it inherently odd that either of them were working on inventories by themselves in their respective arms rooms.
No, I don't think that's right. She was reportedly married to an ex-soldier but it's not clear whether or not they are actually divorced.In both links below, New2 Houston references AR as CA's estranged husband. Is there correct?
Army confirms remains found belong to Vanessa Guillen; lawmakers demand independent investigation
July 6, 2020
Soldier’s estranged wife charged in connection with Fort Hood soldier Vanessa Guillen’s disappearance, officials say
July 2, 2020
That doesn’t make much sense, given the affidavit says CA is AR’s girlfriend. They were also living together in her apartment off-post. I think officials referred to CA as the estranged wife of a Ft. Hood soldier, and some media interpreted that as AR being the husband. In my opinion, and from what I can tell, her estranged husband is someone entirely unconnected to this.In both links below, New2 Houston references AR as CA's estranged husband. Is there correct?
Army confirms remains found belong to Vanessa Guillen; lawmakers demand independent investigation
July 6, 2020
Soldier’s estranged wife charged in connection with Fort Hood soldier Vanessa Guillen’s disappearance, officials say
July 2, 2020
Hmm wonder why another presser so soon? Are they going to try to do damage control? are any of these two that are speaking the two star guy from the last presser?
I’m going to need a source for the Army arranging a meeting between the family and AR as opposed to a chance encounter at some point.
It’s still a thing, but only in the most technical sense. Temporary promotions can only take place during specifically designated time periods, and the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Army is the person that decides this. It is highly unlikely it will ever be invoked again unless there is a dire shortage of people (and even then I’m not so sure), given the changes in the promotion system that have occurred over the last decade. As I stated earlier, corporals are exactly what that rank was supposed to convey, so there is absolutely no reason for temporary promotions anymore. If a specialist needs to fill an E5 slot, they will receive a lateral promotion to corporal, which designates them as an NCO and technically superior to a specialist (even though they are the same pay grade). If he were promoted into some sort of NCO role, it would be apparent because he would be identified as either a SGT or a CPL. There’s really nothing to back up this theory.
In short, it is highly, and I cannot emphasize “highly” enough, unlikely that he was in any sort of supervisory role over VG. Even if he was magically an NCO that no one knew about, he was still in an entirely different company and in an entirely different NCO support chain/chain of command. It just doesn’t make any sense for that to be a thing.
MOO an estranged husband whonos very thankful he was seperated from this human hyena.That doesn’t make much sense, given the affidavit says CA is AR’s girlfriend. They were also living together in her apartment off-post. I think officials referred to CA as the estranged wife of a Ft. Hood soldier, and some media interpreted that as AR being the husband. In my opinion, and from what I can tell, her estranged husband is someone entirely unconnected to this.
I don't even know why they keep reporting her as the estranged wife of a former soldier. But by now MSM should get it right. She was not the estranged wife of AR
It is allowed when the DCS says it’s allowed, and there is a memo in writing specifying the time period temporary promotions are allowed. There is no such authorization currently in place. So no, it is not currently allowed and I doubt will ever be again.So it's allowed.,
I'm just saying that I doubt the full attack (and resulting, catastrophic skull and dental damage) happened in the armory. I'm far from a fan of the Army's investigation into this murder, but I can't imagine he'd have been able to clean up all the blood evidence if the full hammer attack happened in the armory.What about the hammer that was missing from the armory room? He must have used something similar to a hammer for her skull to be in so many pieces. Jmo
In both links below, New2 Houston references AR as CA's estranged husband. Is this correct?
Army confirms remains found belong to Vanessa Guillen; lawmakers demand independent investigation
July 6, 2020
Soldier’s estranged wife charged in connection with Fort Hood soldier Vanessa Guillen’s disappearance, officials say
July 2, 2020
I understand the warrant, but..what made it different after the remains were found at the river? Did they find evidence there that made them more suspicious of him? As far as what's been released, there wasn't anything new found incriminating him. Was there...maybe I missed it."In order to get geolocation data for a phone, or cell tower data, you need a warrant. For a warrant, you have to have probable cause you suspect someone committed the crime"
In the age of surveillance our privacy is still intact? Good to know. I remember being told our land line was being monitored to make sure we weren't giving out critical information like departure times. Don't know if that was a baseless threat, likely was given enlisted share the same constitutional rights civilians do.
Welcome! Excellent first post. This info corresponds with what I’ve seen. Glad you found a MSM link.First time posting...long time lurker so I hope I do this right. I found an article that mentions her husband confirming that it was not AR.
"Previous Marriage
Aguilar was married to KA, a former soldier once stationed at Fort Hood."
Cecily Aguilar: What we know about evil girlfriend accused of hacking, dismembering beloved Fort Hood soldier, Vanessa Guillen
^^bbmIMO, @m00c0w post (two up) is spot on. I don’t believe MSM has ever implied AR & CA were ever married. She was married to a prior service member, unrelated (IMO) to this case.
That first post about the warrant belongs to m00c0w post 469 so he could better answer your question. I was just remarking on how information is gathered has changed since I was in.I understand the warrant, but..what made it different after the remains were found at the river? Did they find evidence there that made them more suspicious of him? As far as what's been released, there wasn't anything new found incriminating him. Was there...maybe I missed it.
First time posting...long time lurker so I hope I do this right. I found an article that mentions her husband confirming that it was not AR.
"Previous Marriage
Aguilar was married to KA, a former soldier once stationed at Fort Hood."
Cecily Aguilar: What we know about evil girlfriend accused of hacking, dismembering beloved Fort Hood soldier, Vanessa Guillen
I'm relatively new although 3 cases really pulled me in. I really appreciate your great find. It led me to find out CA is originally CB from Jackson, Michigan. This news article lists her schooling in her home town.First time posting...long time lurker so I hope I do this right. I found an article that mentions her husband confirming that it was not AR.
"Previous Marriage
Aguilar was married to KA, a former soldier once stationed at Fort Hood."
Cecily Aguilar: What we know about evil girlfriend accused of hacking, dismembering beloved Fort Hood soldier, Vanessa Guillen