Interesting how so many people here take every opinion SO personally, and spend so much energy being so 'hurt' that they can't discuss things on a rational level and understand that different people have the right to different opinions (something ALSO guaranteed by the Constitution by the way)... Yes I have 'experience' with mental illness and I never said 'no one should ever have compassion'... I said compassion should have its LIMITS. Eating your baby's brain... yeah, that's pretty much the limit. It's beyond comprehension.
<and it is extremely hurtful to come here and read the posts you make that ALL people with mental illness need to be put to death, rather then get treatment, because they are a "waste" of space, or resources.>
speaking for DotsEyes-- when exactly did she say 'ALL mentally ill people need to be put to death"....? i missed that part...
and as for the slippery slope (in terms of sterilization, etc..)-- it never ceases to amaze me that no one ever seems to consider the slippery slope has ALREADY HAPPENED-- but in the OTHER direction. Does that ever occur to anyone?
Oh, you are joking! OF COURSE people who have people they love who suffer from severe mental illness will take your posts personally! And are we rational? Are you? Have you answered even
one of the questions that we've asked to encourage you to think about this on a personal level? What WOULD you do with my little nieces? What WOULD you do with Kat? Would your compassion extend to them? If they were your sisters, would you want them to die for something they did not have the capacity to understand? Whether you want to admit it or not, this is an intensely personal topic for those of us who love mentally ill relatives/friends.
The slippery slope on sterilization happened some time ago. Thank my God, it was determined to be unconstitutional.
It is NOT LEGAL to sterilize people in the USA because of their mental status or IQ or social standing or education. Thank God.
I know this case is heart rending. It's hard to read about, hard to fathom, and unbelievably sad. I pray that the baby died quickly and didn't suffer.
I don't know if you're the only one that feels as you do, but "Hearing voices" isn't lame. Often "Hearing voices" is a symptom of Schizophrenia which is a real disorder. "Hearing voices" also often happens during psychosis. Mental illness is as real as cancer and just like cancer, mental illness comes in varying degrees of severity. Some cases are mild others are incurable.
Your statement that she "knew it was wrong" because she was "crying I killed my baby" suggests to me that you might not understand the definition of insanity. Insane (psychotic) people may very well tell you what they did and may or may not exhibit some agitation but they don't attempt to hide, lie, conceal, escape or in anyway elude LE or deny their actions. Why? Because they DON'T realize what they did was wrong and they don't realize there will be consequences for their actions....hence they don't lie about it. They do not realize the severity of what they have done.
Whether or not she can "be fixed" has nothing to do with whether or not she should be executed. First, in the US there is "innocent until proven guilty", second is the issue of "competency". And while I am a supporter of the death penalty I do not support it for those who are truly psychotic or too retarded to understand what they have done.
Girl, I am loving your posts. (Also love all my little finches at my feeders!)
I agree with your comment on Otty's statement "I killed my baby!" I've listened to the tape, and Otty does not begin screaming that she killed her baby until her sister tells the 911 operator that the baby is dead. She is clearly confused, thinking her sister told her that she (the sister) had died, so couldn't watch Scotty anymore. (Kinda makes me wonder if the sis told her 'I'm dead tired' when she brought the baby back to Otty.) Whatever happened, it is clear that Otty doesn't understand "dead" like we do.
I also totally agree that the death penalty does not and should not depend upon the possibility of the person being fixed or not. Our justice system says that we do not execute those who cannot tell right from wrong, period. There are many countries that DO execute the mentally ill, and I'd bet a barrel of monkys that not one of us would wish to live in the culture of those cultures.
I think it is obvious that some people believe mental illness is "ugly" or "the fault of the sufferer" or "not worthy of compassion" and that really, really stresses to me that they really do not understand the nature of the beast. Mental illness is nothing that anyone would wish upon themselves, and by its very nature, those who suffer most profoundly from it don't even realize the degree to which they are suffering.
If you are an American you should realize it is because our society is JUST.
While many people throughout history have committed horrible acts, no human being is a "waste". Your pov reminds me of the quote from Scrooge in "A Christmas Carol " when he refers to the poor and afflicted and says "If they would rather die, they should do it and decrease the surplus population" I guess I feel strongly on this issue because I once thought that the mentally handicapped were basically a "surplus population" and were a waste but then God gave me a beautiful but mentally handicapped son and I had to face my demons and realize every life is a gift from God and begins beautifully.
God bless you, God bless your son. He is certainly not a waste!
And I would hazard to guess that you'd be willing to serve on that panel who decides which lines should not be crossed and where the limit to sympathy should lie? You do realize that you can't legislate human emotion and that sympathy IS a human emotion.
I sure wouldn't want to be on that panel. Especially since the criteria seems to be that the sicker they are, the more detached from reality, the more deserving of death.
God forbid.