lonetraveler
Crime Addict
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2008
- Messages
- 17,492
- Reaction score
- 44,832
I can see why with everything they took especially the documents and such, that they also took the older daughter, it seems to me with the documents that they may have thought like was speculated on here several days ago with the rehoming type of thing.
I think that the fact they are doing ground searches and such now means they have steered a different path, but usually, something like a birth certificate wouldn't come up with a missing child or be considered relevant to the case -or relevant enough to ask for warrants to get those types of documents.
Reading the list seems like they had several different theories and have been going over everything to rule things out.
One item that surprised me for a 3-year-old was the changing table cover. The Amber Alert didn't say if she was wearing a diaper or not (I don't know if they normally do?) but I had honestly assumed that at 3 she would be potty trained -or potty trained enough that she wouldn't require a change table anymore, like say if she was using pull-ups or night time diapers. They still haven't said she wasn't potty trained, but this item just struck me as a bit odd to still have in use.
I agree, this is very telling IMO. I think she was harmed due to her father being in a rage. I don't believe the "Milk" story at all.