Jethro4WS
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2016
- Messages
- 6,054
- Reaction score
- 35,234
For what it is worth I haven't figured that out and it does seem odd to me. Clearly at the time BB would still have been someone high on MPD's list. And they did specifically say:This SW is for BB's FB, including all login IPs, messages, etc. And it states that the victim MB had an affair with KC and that MB used FB's messaging function to contact others. Why would that information be listed in a SW for BB's account? I've asked this before but I think it's worth discussing. Maybe this is important. What could LE learn from BB's account that would be supported by mentioning how MB used her own FB account?
"In the course of investigating this crime Affiant has developed probable cause to believe that Brandon Keith Bevers is the spouse of the victim of this crime, and that Brandon Keith Bevers has been using a computer to access the Facebook social media website and has engaged in message transactions constituting evidence in this murder investigation and possibly other offenses."
I think that should have been enough. So it does perplex me that we see the KC reference here at all with respect only to MB.
One other thing that interests me is that neither this FB warrant nor the FB warrant for MB mentions the "puncture wounds" description part of the murder that were in other warrants.