D
Deleted member 102539
Guest
At first, I do believe they felt it was untargeted. But after viewing the videos and then interviewing witnesses, it became apparent to them it was targeted. Husband out of town, revelations Missy was or had "affairs", fil out of town, scorned women who may have wanted her dead, scorned men who may have wanted her dead, the timing, the location, nothing missing from the church, the SP's actions and lack of how to break in, the way they were dressed
in a SWAT outfit, no worry about looking directly into the camera, the car in the SWFA parking lot....
I did and still do find it interesting
that the PD stated it appeared SP spent a lot of time in the kitchen, and their belief SP exited the same place where he entered. What makes them say that? I can't make it work that SP would have exited the same way he came in. The camera in the NE corner would have caught that.
And maybe they've come back to the untargeted theory because it was a prospect they never seriously considered and because other leads haven't panned out. (that we are aware of)
But....it is still my opinion that MB was targeted. Too many reasons why and not enough reasons why it was a burglary in process. But, all bases need to be covered and they would be remiss not to investigate all angles. (Unless MPD thought refocusing it on murder while burglary in process would quiet the masses and /or hoping that SP will lower their defenses and slip up.)
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
bbm
Well, this! Why was that emphasized??