Amateurpi1
Active Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2016
- Messages
- 220
- Reaction score
- 174
The Altima has it in car before they got to church.
How do you know? The pics of that car are too dark to tell anything IMO…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Altima has it in car before they got to church.
LE - who has seen more of the video than anyone here, and who has the ability and opportunity to access and fiddle with the original in ways we cannot - says it's only one perp seen in the video. I trust the advantage that comes from having much more info, and their ability to discern. One person on video.
LE - who has seen more of the video than anyone here, and who has the ability and opportunity to access and fiddle with the original in ways we cannot - says it's only one perp seen in the video. I trust the advantage that comes from having much more info, and their ability to discern. One person on video.
Respectfully, At the 4/22 MPD press conference aprox 5:50 mark they state they do not know if it's a man or woman. At aprox 6:15 mark female reporter asks if they can rule out more than one perp. MPD spokesperson says paraphrasing: uh, uh, everything's on the table. We simply don't know. All we know is we want to find them whether it's one person, two, three or four.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dFyae4KYe74
No sir, you are twisting their words into things they did not say. They said they do not know if there were more people than the single videoed person involved (such as outside conspirators). But in saying that, they made it clear there is exactly ONE person seen on video. (Keep in mind that by having full access and exact layout of both the church and the cams for each shot, with in-between video that we haven't seen, it's easy for them to put it all together in ways we cannot.)
A little off topic, but in light of the recent posts and the possibility of more than one person seen on video inside the church ( I now see two), I think it would be interesting to know from which phone BB's sister was called to come to the home for the girls. Was she called from the house phone or from a cell. If a cell, where did it ping at the time of that call?
No sir, you are twisting their words into things they did not say. They said they do not know if there were more people than the single videoed person involved (such as outside conspirators). But in saying that, they made it clear there is exactly ONE person seen on video. (Keep in mind that by having full access and exact layout of both the church and the cams for each shot, with in-between video that we haven't seen, it's easy for them to put it all together in ways we cannot.)
I am not twisting their words as their words are what they said.
I've said this before in this discussion - but I volunteer in women's prisons. That walk of the perp is the way prison GUARDS walk, in my experience. I don't know why they walk that way, but virtually all of them do. Prisoners, in my experience, shuffle around kind of humbly.
Respectfully, to the extent that you are making a claim that they expressed an uncertainty about how many they saw IN THE VIDEO, then yes you are twisting their words. They said explicitly there was ONE person in the video. ONE. And it was said in a way that cannot be taken any other way. Then, in that context, they went on to clarify that they couldn't close the door on involvement of others NOT SEEN on video (ie, conspirators numbering one or more), which was the point in which they said they don't know how many are involved.
Cannonball's point, that they might have goofed in interpreting what they see, is true. (I think it's more likely that we, looking at less footage and with far less knowledge, are goofing when we imagine more than one perp in the video, but I'll admit the hypothetical possibility that LE is stupid.) But there was no fuzziness on what they said as to what they see. ONE. To me, that's an important distinction, to understand that if you think you see several, you should realize you are saying your limited view has it right and LE doesn't.
Oh, and as to Cannonball's point that they might have changed their minds when they looked closer, as of late May it was one perp they were seeing on video. That was 4-5 weeks after the crime, after separate outside LE orgs came in to take a look too, and certainly after the video would have been examined and re-examined many times.
The third pic from the top does not look like the original video. It seems to show what we see in the extended video at the 52 or 53 second mark. But it shows the full outline of a face with dark glasses on. That is not on the extended video. In fact, it's pretty clear from the rest of the video that you would never be able to see that much exposed skin of the facial area.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
is it possible that local Telly stations released different snippets????
The third pic from the top does not look like the original video. It seems to show what we see in the extended video at the 52 or 53 second mark. But it shows the full outline of a face with dark glasses on. That is not on the extended video. In fact, it's pretty clear from the rest of the video that you would never be able to see that much exposed skin of the facial area.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk