If they ever found the cabbie he might be able to describe the man, but they'd have to find both the man and the cabbie for him to be identified. Tirrel was a 16 year old high school kid, if the man in the cab was one of his friends they probably would have more info and getting into the cab on 10th & Hudson wouldn't be considered the last time he was seen.
Tirrel went by Mia and dressed as a female. Just because he was a 16 year old who wore female clothes doesn't mean he was a sex worker. I's possible, but the kid went to a special theater school on 43rd
Tirrel Santiago was last seen on the 300 block of Rodney st. Bklyn NY.
True it doesn't. But if Tirrel had no back or leg pain no limp no physio being done it might also mean it's not him either.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
:yourock:
Post mortem said he May have suffered from Musculoskeletal disorder but maybe he didnt. I have no idea what they mean by may. I wish they would have been more clear. If it was wear and tear you would think he would be older or was an extreme athlete (football player) maybe child laborer from china? Rheumatoid arthritis can strike at a very young age. But I would think an autopsy could show the difference.
NAMUS, Charley Project, and other sourses report last sighting in Bklyn.Not according to the NYPD police blotter. And I think the SS thing is someone else
As does Missing and Exploited Children's poster and the New York State Police.NAMUS, Charley Project, and other sourses report last sighting in Bklyn.
Post mortem said he May have suffered from Musculoskeletal disorder but maybe he didnt. I have no idea what they mean by may. I wish they would have been more clear. If it was wear and tear you would think he would be older or was an extreme athlete (football player) maybe child laborer from china? Rheumatoid arthritis can strike at a very young age. But I would think an autopsy could show the difference.
If one looks at the map where all of the bodies/remains were located along the causeway it is interesting that the 4 in burlap were closest to Asian John Doe and all were intact like Asian John Doe. The Asian John Doe is so close to the other bodies it begs the question as to whether or not Asian John Doe's body lying intact and undiscovered in that area inspired the killer to leave the other 4 bodies intact in that same area after, but hidden by burlap and stripped b/c he wanted to see their naked preserved FEMALE bodies.
It's almost like Asian John Doe allowed the killer to see that dismembering and scattering remains was more risky than just leaving whole intact bodies. A year or two before that Asian Doe was left intact some of the dismembered remains had been discovered within a small time period of being left out (Manorville victim Jessica Taylor) and other victims dismembered remains found years before (Jane Doe 6 and Fire Island Jane Doe). IMO I see an evolution of a killer and his disposal methods according to what had been found and what had not. Rifkin evolved in the same way.
NAMUS, Charley Project, and other sourses report last sighting in Bklyn.
How do we know the information in the blotter turned out to be reliable, it doesn't seem to be corroborated anywhere else?Dee I would go with the police blotter report but that's just me. Most of the other sours are vague and lacking any real detail but the blotter report makes sense. The others just say last seen near his home address, but the blotter is specific, 10th & Hudson, which makes sense and says he was last seen getting into a cab with a man. It's up to you, but I'd go with that. The others I think are an error or just laziness
Do you have a link for the police blotter? Typically LE will document the last place a family member saw the missing person. Was he spotted by friends in Manhattan after leaving Bklyn? And was he a student anywhere?Dee I would go with the police blotter report but that's just me. Most of the other sours are vague and lacking any real detail but the blotter report makes sense. The others just say last seen near his home address, but the blotter is specific, 10th & Hudson, which makes sense and says he was last seen getting into a cab with a man. It's up to you, but I'd go with that. The others I think are an error or just laziness
http://nypost.com/2005/09/26/nypd-daily-blotter-1210/Do you have a link for the police blotter? Typically LE will document the last place a family member saw the missing person. Was he spotted by friends in Manhattan after leaving Bklyn? And was he a student anywhere?
How do we know the information in the blotter turned out to be reliable, it doesn't seem to be corroborated anywhere else?