Hello, new here but a long time reader, so apologies for any mistakes.
I’d doubt New Age traveller sites were a possibility because I think they were terrified of being found. Equally, the rural Welsh are chatty - even to New Age travellers - and those communities often chat to locals, even if keeping their distance.
Something I think is key and might not be fully understood by some is that the bar for removing children from families is set very high. Families have to consistently demonstrate they won’t make changes and are putting their children’s safety at risk. This is more than low level neglect or one episode of suspected violence. I’m an adoptee and involved in the UK adoption community and children who have been removed have gone through sustained periods of trauma where their needs have not been met or they’ve been subjected to horrific abuse (often multiple times). I’m not saying CM or MG did any of these things because so many situations are possible, but I am saying ‘forced’ adoptions are ‘forced’ to protect children from severely dangerous situations, give them a supportive family (usually trained in therapeutic parenting techniques to aid trauma recovery) and not because parents are deemed permanently ‘unfit to breed’ at all. Parents do have the chance to parent again if they make long term significant changes and are usually given support and opportunities to do so. There are still assessments for unborn children before a removal order is granted (the child has to be born for the actual legal order to be made, iirc). There are also charities like Pause, who work with birth mums to encourage them to learn about themselves and take time to address their own needs before having another child, who (after they’ve worked through their issues) they are so much more likely to keep. At the moment, SS is underfunded and case loads are high, so that support isn’t as available as it was. However, the aim is always to keep the family together and it’s the most extreme cases where that stops being possible.
Equally, a very small number of children are still relinquished, but that’s very rare in the modern world.
It can be a cycle though: parents have issues and the support fails and parents aren’t able to make changes in time, they have another child and are increasingly afraid to have them taken, but are equally still not able to address their own difficulties, services respond in certain ways because of their history and it drives them deeper into the cycle of hiding issues and the child is even more at risk. It doesn’t mean the system is entirely wrong or the child wasn’t at risk in the first place, but it’s still a terrifying situation for almost any parent to be in, whether they’re able to appropriately care for their children or not. I’m
(Side note: Some good documentaries outlining the types of issues parents might face and the process are ‘Protecting our Children’, where one of the couples included lived in a tent and were homeless and ‘15000 kids and counting’.)
I agree with above posters that, after a number of births, it would be possible to be very prepared and clean up the majority of mess after if straightforward. There’s also plenty of home birth and free birth advice available with details on what to do.
Equally, I think it’s interesting CM mentioned the (lack of) bath. I’d imagine any intelligent mother with SS involvement would have known to run away with a baby risked police becoming involved, just how much that would influence all their recorded interactions (eg. Text, email) with an assumption they have the chance of being analysed later on must be a strong consideration.
I do find this case unusual, even though (JMOO) so many factors appear to tie in commonly to other child protection related cases.