carbuncle69
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2016
- Messages
- 49
- Reaction score
- 279
What criminal activity are you referring to carbuncle? And since when has Aye not voiced his/her opinion or said s/he has not visited E.Anglia? For months it was said C couldn't leave H/s on foot despite SP continually saying cctv was not 100%. Suddenly it is realised you can leave the H/s and only then the request to search the other buildings and bins was made AFAIK.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4131428/Corrie-McKeague-girlfriend-members-fab-swingers.htmlPolice say its virtually impossible to walk more than a few yards from the spot where McKeague was last seen without being caught on camera.
....
While they do not provide total coverage of every possible exit route for the entire time, police say it is highly, highly unlikely that McKeague could have left town on foot without being filmed.
We cant be 100 per cent sure, but weve analysed everything, from whether a person could squeeze along a wall undetected, to whether they could run down a particular street when the camera was rotated in a certain direction, Im told.
There are some gaps in coverage, but they are tiny. Theres no more than a 1 or 2 per cent chance that he walked away, even if he was trying not to be seen.
Note that's not a 1-2% chance of him walking away, that's 1-2% chance *if* he's trying to be stealthy, commando crawling under cameras, using passing cars for cover, which there's no indication he was. All of which tallies with what we know of the camera locations. Now you could say that's not 100%, but come on. Virtually impossible.
And if you combine that with the mobile phone mast data and the (erroneous) bin data you were left IMO with a near certainty of third party involvement and an extremely high likelihood of foul play, whether murder, kidnapping or covering up an accident. May still be.