UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #7

[SOMETHINGWILLDO]

Thanks, Wlm17 - just read through the info on that link and it looks like the RAF should be searching for him, too, if I read it right!

SHOULD being the magic word. As far as we know they aren't, so what makes Corries case any different?
They don't think he has went AWOL, they haven't classed it as a murder enquiry, he is classed as missing, but not officially missing. My brain hurts [emoji30].


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[goape]

Is the Doncaster body the sewer one its just come upon my news feed but I can get the link does anyone know please ?

It's irrelevant.

 

[goape]

Thanks, Wlm17 - just read through the info on that link and it looks like the RAF should be searching for him, too, if I read it right!

All of the policy means nothing to Corrie's case, they don't believe he is AWOL and haven't registered him as such.

 

[bbyblueeyez]

it maybe irrelevant to do with this case however its not irrelevant to me very close friend been missing since xmas a young man it just made my heart leap that was all

 

[goape]

it maybe irrelevant to do with this case however its not irrelevant to me very close friend been missing since xmas a young man it just made my heart leap that was all

But this is a thread about Corrie?

 

[bbyblueeyez]

I understand that Goape it just made me think of Corrie of My friend at the end of day could of been anyone its irrelevant to this case I agree and thank god to but that's still someones boy that is all

 

[SOMETHINGWILLDO]

All of the policy means nothing to Corrie's case, they don't believe he is AWOL and haven't registered him as such.

But on the off chance that he is awol, these rules would apply?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Scorpio1]

But on the off chance that he is awol, these rules would apply?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just the same if on the of chance he isn't awol he should still be on the missing person register if he is no awol, doesn't make sense,

 

[Amonet]

There's a thread in the Unidentified section of the forum for the young man found deceased in Doncaster

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...ncaster-Male-body-recovered-from-sewage-works

There's not really any identification info in there yet, but that's where to keep up with anything as someone will probably post an update as soon as one is released to the media.

 

[bbyblueeyez]

Thank you so much Amonet someone kindly sent me a link some lovely people in here who have a lot of patience

 

[SOMETHINGWILLDO]

No they only apply from the point where the RAF class him as AWOL which they haven't done.

Ah, my bad!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[calo44]

No they only apply from the point where the RAF class him as AWOL which they haven't done.

What do they classify missing service members as, if not AWOL? Is there another classification(s) they use maybe?

 

[Amonet]

What do they classify missing service members as, if not AWOL? Is there another classification(s) they use maybe?

I would think that missing of their own volition would be AWOL, but missing where there's a suspicion that it's not of their own volition would simply be 'missing' as it is for a civilian?

 

[Dcflag]

I've been thinking, I wonder if four minute lurker is significant BECAUSE they aren't seen going into the horseshoe

 

[SOMETHINGWILLDO]

I've been thinking, I wonder if four minute lurker is significant BECAUSE they aren't seen going into the horseshoe

Could well be?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Shiressleuth]

All of the policy means nothing to Corrie's case, they don't believe he is AWOL and haven't registered him as such.

what do they (raf?) believe then?

 

[suzyjackson]

I've been thinking, I wonder if four minute lurker is significant BECAUSE they aren't seen going into the horseshoe

Which would mean that they must have been dropped off by a vehicle?

 

[suzyjackson]

59 guests viewing the thread, join up and give us your thoughts

 

[Shiressleuth]

I've been thinking, I wonder if four minute lurker is significant BECAUSE they aren't seen going into the horseshoe

I think they probably have a car in there if you think about it or they only go in there when they get a call or text and then see their customer go in on foot or drive in themselves.

 

[Dcflag]

Which would mean that they must have been dropped off by a vehicle?

Exactly, or driven in and given the vehicle keys to someone else. Four minute lurker seems to be emphasised as important