The length of time Helen had been ingesting the sleeping tablets would be clear from hair analysis.
Only up to however long her hair was though. I seem to remember they cut her hair into sections and all sections tested positive but don't recall them giving any dates before 2016.
“He gave us as much information as he could at that time."
Yep, a hair cut would have removed the earliest traces ( thinking of another famous story here, but I wont go there )
DC Daines continues her evidence
There will now be evidence from Detective Constable Hollie Daines, who was half way through her evidence on Friday.
On the conclusion of the interview and when the machines were switched off, Stewart said: Am I still the main suspect? I must be, I must be a suspect.
Just read the other replies (thanks guys) and arrgh it seems that Helen's hair length was only long enough for them to check back to January 2016. How frustrating!
12:18 KEY EVENT
DC Daines continues her evidence
There will now be evidence from Detective Constable Hollie Daines, who was half way through her evidence on Friday.
On the conclusion of the interview and when the machines were switched off, Stewart said: Am I still the main suspect? I must be, I must be a suspect.
We explained he wasnt a suspect, but he was a key witness.
There was a discussion about press conferences. We asked Stewart if he wanted to do an appeal to find Helen. He wasnt keen on the idea, he felt the media would twist anything he would have said and that a no would soon end up being a yes.
He said he might write onto Helens blog page as a way of reaching out to her, but we asked if he could hold off.
Searches around the area had been taken place. He said he felt he should be informed of any searches taking place that included searches to his house, as he felt like he hadnt been told anything.
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/helen-bailey-murder-trial-royston-12491486
That doesn't sound right to me from what little I do know about hair analysis. Her hair, to my knowledge was always below shoulders. Didn't it say somewhere 35 cm was tested and it showed the sleeping tablet use back as far as Jan 2016. Her hair and 35 cm of it would be long enough to tell if it showed the med use before Jan 2016.Just read the other replies (thanks guys) and arrgh it seems that Helen's hair length was only long enough for them to check back to January 2016. How frustrating!
That's quite telling since they were only investigating a missing person at that stage.
This has been my biggest "wow" moment so far. How very very telling that comment is considering that at this stage Helen was still considered a missing person.
The other comment about "catch me off guard" is another one.
Talk about dig a hole and jump in.
11:54
'Nothing out of the ordinary'
Dr Putchaski is now being cross-examined by the defence.
He reiterates that Stewart had a major operation on the main bowel, undertaken by keyhole surgery.
He said that Stewart’s underlying health condition could cause a change to facial expressions, such as smiling - although he said he was in no way an expert on the condition.
However, when re-examined by the prosecution, he reiterated: “Stewart appeared to have a normal facial appearance, nothing struck me out of the ordinary.”
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/helen-bailey-murder-trial-royston-12491486
We also spoke about Boris the dog, we were asking about the dogs lead and any favourite toys that would have gone with them as well.
I read such questions as cops psyching him out TBHonest.