We post an awful lot of things on here that are not lawful while a case is sub judice. Anything at all that has not been put before the jury in open court should not be discussed, if we're going to get picky. The only reason we get away with it is because this site is hosted in the good ol' US of A and outside of the jurisdiction English courts.
The jury is always told not to do any research on the internet, or to read any newspapers etc, during the trial. They are only allowed to base their deliberations on the evidence put before them.
Personally, I would err on the side of caution and not risk upsetting the judiciary. The last thing you want is to get to court one morning and find they won't let you in or worse they haul you before the judge for a contempt hearing.
You can always pm me though
ETA if the jury has already heard them, it will be up to the judge to tell them to disregard that evidence. You won't be risking much by saying it here to be honest.