The Police wanted them to come forward voluntarily.
My misunderstanding of SVS's post then Chester. Came across as the OP was suggesting the other two persons were LS and another?
The Police wanted them to come forward voluntarily.
Ah sorry Jessie, that wasnt what I was thinkingMy misunderstanding of SVS's post then Chester. Came across as the OP was suggesting the other two persons were LS and another?
Ah sorry Jessie, that wasnt what I was thinking
Im just putting it out there that LE may already be aware of the identity of any number of people on the cctv already, (I dont know which or who they may be) and that it's not neccessarily Identity that is the information the cctv was released to garner.?It would be really interesting in what you were thinking then SVS. I know my mind seems clear to me but I acknowledge I don't always post a clarified response.![]()
The Police wanted them to come forward voluntarily.
It was funny though...a little lightness is okI shouldn't have laughed at the Tom, Dick or Pawel.
If the Oak park cctv shows, for example, PR with LS, and the police know that, then they may want the other two (running man and cycling man) to come forward in case they saw or heard something which could help the police prove that PR is connected with LS's disappearance.
I typically try to wait to post something to see if others have already expressed my sentiments...but ?!!?!?@ly502 that was exactly my reaction when i read the post first time. Now i just LOL...
Because you can't arrest someone for walking down the street.Who or why would they want or need them to come forward voluntarily?
If the Oak park cctv shows, for example, PR with LS, and the police know that, then they may want the other two (running man and cycling man) to come forward in case they saw or heard something which could help the police prove that PR is connected with LS's disappearance.
Because you can't arrest someone for walking down the street.
This stretch of Oak Road is entirely unpaved and unlit until it reaches the park's main entrance at Beresford Avenue. In places, it was quite boggy underfoot. The playing fields are open to the left, and the occasional house has a back gate which opens out onto it.
We know very little. That means that theres a lot left over to play with.I'm lost as to how this would fit with what we know ? Albeit very little ? How would these people fit into the crime ?
We know very little. That means that theres a lot left over to play with.
Approximately halfway between the northern extent and Beresford Avenue, this gate gives foot access to Etherington Drive.