There was mention that the family habitually use that part of the river for fly tipping rubbish.
However, to my best knowledge there has been no suggestion that JC and Youth were captured on camera moving bin bags.
IIRC, it was stated that JC was seen carrying something about his shoulders that appeared to be Logan's body, arms hanging over his back. That the youth was walking beside or slightly behind him. I don't recall any mention of either of them carrying any bags or tipping any bags. They also went on a second missing whereby Logan's torn clothing was scattered about.
Also, JC has stated he carried Logan and laid him at the river, not realising the Youth was following behind.
So, the doorbell camera footage and JC's own statement directly conflict with this testimony.
Could it be the Youth will now argue he was forced to do as he was told?
For me the horror of this narrative is that overtly, poor tiny dead Logan is being directly affiliated with litter that is too bothersome and expensive to dispose of correctly.
JC clearly concocted this plan and it is very revealing of his psyche and feelings towards Logan - furtively tip this unwanted item in the river like a black bin bag. Is there a racist tone to that? Logan has no worth, no value, should be denied a proper burial service, no one will notice or care. I think they imagined no ones even bothered to establish what had happened to Logan - like yeah we used to have a kid but one night he disappeared and maybe some woman took him but we don't know. OK, so that's that. Did they not imagine anyone would mount a search? That life would just go on but without Logan? Cos that's how it's coming off to me.