Found Deceased UK - Nicola Bulley Last Seen Walking Dog Near River - St Michaels on Wyre (Lancashire) #10

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
*We continue to look at all the potential scenarios to eliminate them. We are reviewing our decisions regularly. Based on all the work we have done up to now, our belief remains that Nicola may have fallen into the river for some reason*

C&P from that LE Twitter. There seems to be a change in tone here. That's not a criticism, and it's inevitable at this stage, I guess.
That is consistent.

 
She was muted and had her camera off but if they were on a con call presumably there were people speaking. I'm not saying they knew it was a teams call but they may have heard someone speaking.
And depends if she was using loudspeaker or earphones (..and where are they if she was using them)
 
9.30am – The Teams call ended but Nicola stayed logged on

9.33am (approximately) – Nicola’s mobile phone and Willow were found at a bench by the river by another dog-walker.

I doubt the teams call ended at 9.30 exactly, the same way the 9.33 is approximate. I mean it's possible it was scheduled to run til 9.30 but when do meetings end bang on time?

If she was listening on loudspeaker as her friends have said she usually did, there is IMO obviously a chance that when the person discovered the phone the teams call was still going on and they would have heard it through the loudspeaker.

I'm not sure that tells us anything extra, but that it was definitely something untoward if you'd come across it. Just speculating that the times could have feasibly crossed over.
Ours end, they have a little count down and then they "end" and the recording stops and you get a normal teams chat screen, then if you don't log out (because hypothetically you might have wandered to the fridge to get a snack) you are still connected to the room, but its just you in there.
 
Muted and camera off. How would a witness possibly know it was in a conference call ?
It was the police who stated that, not the witness. IMO (but Google should give you that link)
The police unlocked the phone one way or the other (maybe his husband knew the screenlock code) and they observed that a Teams app was open and logged into a Meeting (that other participants had probably all left, but it does not not auto-throw you out).
 
There's an informative video on the BBC news website that shows an excellent visual perspective on the area Nicola went missing: Home - BBC News. Might only be viewable to those in the UK.
"Reporter Nick Garnett looks at where the mother-of-two could have gone, and what happens with the search now."
He states:
"This is St Michael's on Wyre. As you can see it's not very big. That's why the disappearance of Nicola Bulley is so puzzling. And the police think that she fell down into the river and drowned but it's a theory; there's no actual evidence for it...
So if she's not in the river, where could she be?
So this is the only path out of this whole area that's not covered by a CCTV camera.
So if she came out of this way, where did she go at this point. If you turn 'round and look here, it's a busy road. Hundreds of cars were going past here at 9 o'clock on a Friday morning.
And in the other direction there's not that much empty space and no other way out.
But that hasn't stopped people speculating...
Two weeks have past since Nicola Bulley's disappearance and there's still no sign of her at St. Michael's on Wyre. The search has been widened down stream. But instead of a small meandering river, the Wyre estuary, well it's huge.
From here the river becomes the sea. The police are now tasked with searching the inlands and marshland."
 
All I said was she was out walking her dog. I'm trying to think of any men who have disappeared recently in the middle of the day whilst out walking their dog. Nope. Drew a blank there.
we actually had a similar scenario a few weeks ago- lady didn’t answer her phone one evening , police swarmed the fields the following morning 10 minutes after they were rang with search dogs etc-her dog found wandering on their usual route- an hour later woman found lying in a ditch. Luckily she survived. If the ditch had been a river she would have gone. She just misplaced her feet.
 
I disagree. Hindsight is 20/20. My world is populated by busy parents and toddlers, parks, walks, dropped toys, forgotten baby change bags, etc etc. If - in a busy little dog/walking route like that - I spotted a dog and phone on a bench, I would NOT immediately think I should ring the police.

My first thought would be that a busy parent had taken a child off to the bushes because they couldn't wait for the bathroom, or that someone was chasing a toddler or something.

Most people would clock it for a matter of a minute or so, wandering past. Unless you were waiting there for a period of time, you'd have no idea how long the owner was gone for. If a period of time elapsed, yes, my thoughts on it would change, and I'd take appropriate action. Walking past and just seeing a dog and phone? Nope. I would not immediately call the police.

To say that someone is a idiot or dimwit for not 'connecting the dots' is full-strength Hindsight 20/20, IMO.
In one of the first threads there was talk of and angler association names for each spot of the river as well so maybe fisherman expected.

Taking the time to tie up a dog protecting it from going unattended into the river & especially the road is very sensible.
 
Well I haven't been out walking on my own since Nicola disappeared. It was the same when Sarah Everard disappeared. I don't get why women can disappear in the middle of the day and things don't get solved in time. We have so much technology, so much tracking, but CCTV isn't maintained and attitudes don't change. I respect the police for their efforts, and I hate the media storm for the investigation and Nicola's family - it's way out of control. But I also hate that these things can happen when a woman is just out walking her dog.
I never walk alone anywhere in a wooded area / country park, etc. Tend to stick to residential areas, yet look at poor Sarah Everard.
 
I disagree. Hindsight is 20/20. My world is populated by busy parents and toddlers, parks, walks, dropped toys, forgotten baby change bags, etc etc. If - in a busy little dog/walking route like that - I spotted a dog and phone on a bench, I would NOT immediately think I should ring the police.

My first thought would be that a busy parent had taken a child off to the bushes because they couldn't wait for the bathroom, or that someone was chasing a toddler or something.

Most people would clock it for a matter of a minute or so, wandering past. Unless you were waiting there for a period of time, you'd have no idea how long the owner was gone for. If a period of time elapsed, yes, my thoughts on it would change, and I'd take appropriate action. Walking past and just seeing a dog and phone? Nope. I would not immediately call the police.

To say that someone is a idiot or dimwit for not 'connecting the dots' is full-strength Hindsight 20/20, IMO.
I disagree. If I found a dog running loose and an unattended mobile phone there, I would 110% be concerned and make sure everything was alright. Mobile phones are not something that people leave lying around on public benches while they take their kid for a wee. It wouldn’t take long in a quiet area like that to ascertain that a person who owns a mobile phone and a dog is seemingly missing from the vicinity and not just “chasing their toddler”…..the fact it’s right next to a river would concern me even more.

Not hindsight…I know I would connect the dots.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just don't know how he can tell Ch.5 that he's "100% certain she didn't go in the river"
Probably his mind can't process that she went out with the kids and the dog on an ordinary day and disappeared - possibly for ever. If she's in the river, that's it. So he's holding on to the belief that there must be another explanation.
 
There's an informative video on the BBC news website that shows an excellent visual perspective on the area Nicola went missing: Home - BBC News. Might only be viewable to those in the UK.
"Reporter Nick Garnett looks at where the mother-of-two could have gone, and what happens with the search now."
He states:
"This is St Michael's on Wyre. As you can see it's not very big. That's why the disappearance of Nicola Bulley is so puzzling. And the police think that she fell down into the river and drowned but it's a theory; there's no actual evidence for it...
So if she's not in the river, where could she be?
So this is the only path out of this whole area that's not covered by a CCTV camera.
So if she came out of this way, where did she go at this point. If you turn 'round and look here, it's a busy road. Hundreds of cars were going past here at 9 o'clock on a Friday morning.
And in the other direction there's not that much empty space and no other way out.
But that hasn't stopped people speculating...
Two weeks have past since Nicola Bulley's disappearance and there's still no sign of her at St. Michael's on Wyre. The search has been widened down stream. But instead of a small meandering river, the Wyre estuary, well it's huge.
From here the river becomes the sea. The police are now tasked with searching the inlands and marshland."

“So this is the only path out of this whole area that's not covered by a CCTV camera”

According to a friend who lives there this isn’t true. They find it strange that people are being led to believe there are 3 ways you could leave and that 2 of them have CCTV. There's loads of "black spots" - well the whole thing is a CCTV blackspot - it's fields and a footpath, not a London park. CCTV coverage is accidental. You don't need to follow a footpath. You can just cross the fields, or walk in the tree line of the road, or cross the shallow bit of the river (ankle to knee deep that day at low tide) and then a tiny field to the gate and road at Hall Lane. #Hearsay
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Probably his mind can't process that she went out with the kids and the dog on an ordinary day and disappeared - possibly for ever. If she's in the river, that's it. He is holding on to the belief that there must be another explanation.
It's just his opinion, it's not a court of law. He can say whatever he wants.
He's frustrated and saying he doesn't believe she's in the Wyre and wants more to be done.
 
I wonder why Emma didn't say with Paul too. She mentions girls and Willow and happy story. Bit strange to miss Paul out of the happy story. Maybe she just forgot. Being interviewed by reporters is stressful on top of everything else.
Because she is likely to be slated for doing exactly that as some people read nasty aspersions into everything.
 
If a dog is unsettled because either they have seen their owner fall in the water or their owner has just disappeared, how would they react if a stranger came along and tried to tie them to a bench?
I can only speak for my own dog (Jack Russell terrier). I think she’d be confused and wary, and might well try to run away from whoever it was.
 
Sniffer / search dogs were used extensively at the start of the investigation as well as specialist water search dogs later.
Thanks! I guess the dogs didn't come up with any particular direction or make a beeline for the river's edge then!
 
Imagine Nicola was your mum/wife/sister/daughter. I think very few of us would accept that she’s dead with apparently no evidence, not just to prove it, but to even indicate that she did fall in the river and drown.

I certainly wouldn’t and I don’t think this is being delusional. I think it’s very understandable to feel like this. Add to this the fact that believing her to be dead feels almost a betrayal, as though you’ve given up on her.

In this country we all understand the importance of evidence. We don’t put people in prison without evidence and many decisions we make as individuals are made on the basis of evidence.

Asking people to accept the horrifying death of someone you love, based on a phone on a bench near a river, is too much, particularly as she hasn’t been missing for months or years.

Hope isn’t just the thing with feathers, it’s what sustains us through the bleakest and most frightening of times. It’s all they have. Little wonder they are clinging onto it. I would be too.
Agree and to lose hope, acccept they were gone without proof, would be akin to giving up on your loved one. I had family in ITU before they died (was not expected) and when there’s nothing else you can do except believe then you believe as hard as you can.
 
There's an informative video on the BBC news website that shows an excellent visual perspective on the area Nicola went missing: Home - BBC News. Might only be viewable to those in the UK.
"Reporter Nick Garnett looks at where the mother-of-two could have gone, and what happens with the search now."
He states:
"This is St Michael's on Wyre. As you can see it's not very big. That's why the disappearance of Nicola Bulley is so puzzling. And the police think that she fell down into the river and drowned but it's a theory; there's no actual evidence for it...
So if she's not in the river, where could she be?
So this is the only path out of this whole area that's not covered by a CCTV camera.
So if she came out of this way, where did she go at this point. If you turn 'round and look here, it's a busy road. Hundreds of cars were going past here at 9 o'clock on a Friday morning.
And in the other direction there's not that much empty space and no other way out.
But that hasn't stopped people speculating...
Two weeks have past since Nicola Bulley's disappearance and there's still no sign of her at St. Michael's on Wyre. The search has been widened down stream. But instead of a small meandering river, the Wyre estuary, well it's huge.
From here the river becomes the sea. The police are now tasked with searching the inlands and marshland."
"
So this is the only path out of this whole area that's not covered by a CCTV camera.
So if she came out of this way, where did she go at this point. If you turn 'round and look here, it's a busy road. Hundreds of cars were going past here at 9 o'clock on a Friday morning."

Errrr, ....
she could have crossed the road and carried on walking, ..
... or turned left back over the foot bridge and taken the path signed Inskip ....

All visible on streetview.
 
I
I wonder why Emma didn't say with Paul too. She mentions girls and Willow and happy story. Bit strange to miss Paul out of the happy story. Maybe she just forgot. Being interviewed by reporters is stressful on top of everything else.
thought that too
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
159
Guests online
1,619
Total visitors
1,778

Forum statistics

Threads
604,679
Messages
18,175,362
Members
232,802
Latest member
aceofswords
Back
Top