Nancy Drew 21
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2021
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 281
I see. It's complicated isn't it?
I would say that the police have more legal standing to release that information than the brother in law (or husband or any other family member). The rights are personal (unless there is a POA in place).
The problem is that the information which is special category personal data (health related) wasn't released at the start of the investigation when Nicola first went missing. It wasn't given out as a reason why Nicola was vulnerable. The information was released nearly 3 weeks later after the police were receiving a lot of criticism about their handling of the case. Arguably, how did releasing that personal information on the day it was released assist in the investigation as it was at that time? Also there is the wording to consider and the level of confidential health data that was revealed at that time.
The Information Commissioner's Office have released a statement saying they have asked Lancs Police to explain and justify why they thought it was relevant and appropriate to release the detailed personal data they did and their decision process behind this. Depending on the outcome of this report, the ICO will decide whether they believe that Lancs Police have acted in accordance with UK Data Protection Law.