When it comes to child 0, P and Q it’s almost asif, if guilty, it’s become a compulsion at this point. Surely, if guilty, any rational person would know that targeting 3 babies in the space of 3 days would raise eyebrows. Up until this point I think the whole ‘run of bad luck’ thing could have been plausible to the colleagues who didn’t suspect her. But when it comes to that span of 3 babies one after the other, all having contact with LL directly before collapsing, when there had been no collapses while she had been away on holiday, it’s just too much at once for one to consider a coincidence at that point. Why go for 3 one after the other unless you have urges you are struggling to control?
Especially when Dr B (I think it was) had raised the alarm the day of P’s death, it just compounded his suspicions when the very next day baby Q collapsed for apparently no reason. I think the hospital were almost forced to take her off the unit at this point, having had Dr B approach them the day before begging for something to be done and asking if KR would be happy if something happened to another baby. It was the straw that broke the camels back so to speak. I wonder, if Dr B hadn’t come forward at that point with his suspicions, how long would LL have remained on the unit before someone else raised the alarm.
Of importance is the text she received whilst away saying that triplets had arrived on the unit. Then the very day she returned to work, one of the triplets died, then the very next day the second died. When you add that to all the other strange collapses/deaths over the preceding year, it becomes less coincidental and more suspect MOO.
IMO all these experts having testified that babies died/were attacked by an injection of air or insulin, really is strong evidence that tells us there was someone targeting babies on the unit. So the defence either need to have found experts who contradict the conclusions of the experts we’ve already heard, or agree that someone was harming babies but it was not LL.
All MOO