I’m sure LL said on Friday that it was the first arrest she was taken away in her pyjamas. Back at the beginning of may when she was being questioned by BM she specifically said ‘taken away in my pyjamas’, I take that to mean she is claiming that she was taken from her home in her pyjamas.
Someone else made a valid point about her maybe being read her rights in her pyjamas but then able to put her tracksuit on before leaving the house, but from LL’s own mouth she claims to have been taken away in her pyjamas. And then she volunteered the information on Friday that that was the first arrest. Which NJ asked her again ‘would you like to see the video’ and she didn’t answer. So IMO she knows perfectly well that she was not just wearing pyjamas when she left the house.
I’ll try and find the exact quotes now, but IMO she was caught out lying, just like she was caught out lying about being isolated and in despair, NJ methodically and effectively IMO has refuted each and every one of her attempts at sympathy.
It all suggests IMO someone who lies that much they can’t remember what they’ve said to whom. As I always say ‘the truth doesn’t change’, and she volunteered the information on direct examination about having no social life and being taken away in her pyjamas, it’s not asif NJ was asking her to agree with him, she gave that information willingly on her first day on the stand when BM was asking about how this has all affected her so she can’t claim to have been under pressure from the prosecution, it was her own barrister and she was happy to give what we now know was false information to the jury.
MOO