[Blacon interview 1, 3rd July 2018 7.36pm on video]:
LL: They told me that there had been a lot more deaths and that I'd been linked as somebody that was there for a lot of them.
DS: Did
you have any concerns that
there was a rise in mortality rate?
LL: Yes.
DS: Ok, so tell me about that. What concerns did
you have?
LL:
Think we'd all just noticed as a, as a team in general, the nursing staff, that this was a rise compared to previous years.
This is such a short clip from her first arrest interview, but her last answer throws up so many red flags that it could be a lesson in itself in how to recognise manipulation. IMO
A non-manipulative answer (even if not directly addressing the question) would be '
I'd noticed a rise compared to previous years' - about a third of the words she used. All the additional words are manipulative fluff and attempts to divert police from herself.
But she's decided, within a second, to call on the wider support of the nursing team and used the words '
we'd all' to answer what her concerns were. This spreads accountability for having concerns.
Then (again without even having time to consider, so it's second nature for her) she's chucked in the word '
just' - we'd all
just noticed - to minimise the act of noticing the rise in mortality. Compare it to
'I'd noticed' to see how that word 'just' is placed to manipulate and persuade.
'
as a team in general, the nursing staff' - a lot of her short answer is spent introducing who the 'we' are, so she's considered that this is really important for police to know, that Lucy alone wasn't noticing this rise in mortality, she was supported in this and that removes any whiff of her showing unusual interest in mortality.
She avoided answering the question, about what concerned her about the rise. But it looks as if she's answered. It's sufficed to move her past that uncomfortable question so that they can ask another.
MOO