Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks! we had no idea what was going on until we got up in the morning. we had driven to LA the night before and stayed in a hotel overnight so we wouldn't have to drive up early. I turned on the news and was like holey moley! Trying to get 8 people moving in the same direction an hour earlier than we had planned was exciting...but we made it. Southwest airline seem to be the worst from talking to the shuttle driver, their lines were unbelievable.Liz said:Heya Jbean! Good to hear you had a seemingly uneventful flight on such an extremely eventful newsday!
Enjoy and have a safe flight home, too!![]()
Hi Dingo,dingo said:He should have taken him to a nightclub.....thats where our Aussies lost their their lives
scandi said:Thanks Liz and I think they'll be fine. I''ll just be glad when they arrive home in Paris.
I'll give a report back on the pre-takeoff formalities for the fun of it, but the Portland airport is nothing like LAX!
Scandi
Good post Liz.Liz said:Scandi, I hope it's smooth sailing, er flying, for your sister and her cuties tomorrow. Even though these are troubing times to fly, I'm sure it will be fine!![]()
Well, I for one am glad they were busted. I don't care who gets the credit, or takes the credit. Setting politics aside, I am just happy their plot was foiled.Buzzm1 said:Saturday :: August 12, 2006
NBC News: US and UK Disagreed on Timing for Terror Arrests
Via Patriot Daily, NBC reports that the UK didn't want to arrest the London Terror suspects this week, but the US did.
NBC News has learned that U.S. and British authorities had a significant disagreement over when to move in on the suspects in the alleged plot to bring down trans-Atlantic airliners bound for the United States.
A senior British official knowledgeable about the case said British police were planning to continue to run surveillance for at least another week to try to obtain more evidence, while American officials pressured them to arrest the suspects sooner. The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the case.
This British official contradicts earlier reports that the threats were imminent.
While Bush today denied any disagreeements, an Administration official said otherwise and reiterated the timing disagreement.
There was also disagreement over the arrest of Rashid Rauf in Pakistan:
The British official said the Americans also argued over the timing of the arrest of suspected ringleader Rashid Rauf in Pakistan, warning that if he was not taken into custody immediately, the U.S. would "render" him or pressure the Pakistani government to arrest him.
British security was concerned that Rauf be taken into custody "in circumstances where there was due process," according to the official, so that he could be tried in British courts. Ultimately, this official says, Rauf was arrested over the objections of the British.
So the U.S. wanted to go the "ghost air" route. As to the stage of the plan at the time of the arrests:
NBC News has previously reported that the explosive mixture was tested in Pakistan. The source said the suspects in Britain had obtained at least some of the materials for the explosive but had not yet actually prepared or mixed it.
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/015498.htmlhttp://talkleft.com/new_archives/015498.html
My objection is not about who gets the credit for "busting" the terrorist plot, my objection is about U.S. Intelligence/our administration politicizing the terrorist plot.IdahoMom said:Well, I for one am glad they were busted. I don't care who gets the credit, or takes the credit. Setting politics aside, I am just happy their plot was foiled.
Pharlap, there was only one terrorist who was going to make the "Dry Run." The British were going to allow him to do it, as they considered there was no danger, and they wanted to continue to gather information on the overall plot.Pharlap said:Well we really don't know if it was a dry run, only what we were told...
It's a catch 22, could of been a code for the terrorist.![]()
If this is actually true then it sucks.......Buzzm1 said:Pharlap, there was only one terrorist who was going to make the "Dry Run." The British were going to allow him to do it, as they considered there was no danger, and they wanted to continue to gather information on the overall plot.
Unfortunately, it is true Pharlap. When British Intelligence had their first news conference, even though, believe it, or not, I was all but asleep with the TV on, I caught important points during the press conference, one of which was that the terrorist plot was scheduled for later in the summer, and the terrorists hadn't made their reservations yet, indicating that the operation was still in the planning stages. There were enough indications during the press conference for me to gather that the British weren't all too happy about having to pull the string on the operation when they did.Pharlap said:If this is actually true then it sucks.......![]()
What is reported I ususaly take as a gran of salt til there's more infor from alot of sources...even then is it true.....sorry that's how I feel about the reporting these days...
I'm not surprised Bush and Washington wanted the plug pulled and the SOBs rounded up, for crine outloud. It was a month until the 5th anniversary. Do you really want someone to slip through the net or pull an end run this close? It's obvivous it was intended as a 5 year "reminder" of the havoc and destruction these bastards are willing to wreck on innocent civilians. This is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. If they had them this tightly under surveillance and the terrorists still managed to pull it off--and that is always a distint likelihood--there is no fan big enough to take the that would hit it. At the very least, the Great Depression of the 21st Century would effectively begin before sundown of that particular day. Better the bird in the hand than the two in the bush (no pun intended) when it comes to something of this magnitude.Buzzm1 said:Unfortunately, it is true Pharlap. When British Intelligence had their first news conference, even though, believe it, or not, I was all but asleep with the TV on, I caught important points during the press conference, one of which was that the terrorist plot was scheduled for later in the summer, and the terrorists hadn't made their reservations yet, indicating that the operation was still in the planning stages. There were enough indications during the press conference for me to gather that the British weren't all too happy about having to pull the string on the operation when they did.
It is sad for the British, that the U.S. forced this into motion when they did. The Brits and Pakistanis were continually gaining more information as to everyone involved, and being that the British and Pakistan, were the primary agencies involved, it reeks when the U.S. is the one to decide when to expose the plot, going against strenuous British and Pakistani objections.
That's our current administration.
LOL, your story almost sounds like the Home Alone movie ... you didn't leave any kids home on accident, did ya??JBean said:Thanks! we had no idea what was going on until we got up in the morning. we had driven to LA the night before and stayed in a hotel overnight so we wouldn't have to drive up early. I turned on the news and was like holey moley! Trying to get 8 people moving in the same direction an hour earlier than we had planned was exciting...but we made it. Southwest airline seem to be the worst from talking to the shuttle driver, their lines were unbelievable.
Our lines were long, but they were surprisingly organized and we got through in an hour and had an hour to spare!
Scandi..good luck to your sister and her tribe, I'm sure they will be fine.
I'm quite willing to argue the point that the British and the Pakistanis were in a much better position to make a decision about the imminency, and relative danger, of the terrorist plot. The U.S. wasn't directly involved in tracking the terrorist plot. The British and Pakistanis should have been the ones to make the decision as to when to bring the terrorist plot down. For all we know, there may have been many additional high-level terrorists exposed, had the terrorist been allowed to proceed further into the planning stage.BillyGoatGruff said:I'm not surprised Bush and Washington wanted the plug pulled and the SOBs rounded up, for crine outloud. It was a month until the 5th anniversary. Do you really want someone to slip through the net or pull an end run this close? It's obvivous it was intended as a 5 year "reminder" of the havoc and destruction these bastards are willing to wreck on innocent civilians. This is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. If they had them this tightly under surveillance and the terrorists still managed to pull it off--and that is always a distint likelihood--there is no fan big enough to take the that would hit it. At the very least, the Great Depression of the 21st Century would effectively begin before sundown of that particular day. Better the bird in the hand than the two in the bush (no pun intended) when it comes to something of this magnitude.