UK - Prince Andrew accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999 - 2002

[mickey2942]

Well he has a healthy inheritance coming one day. The Queen is 95 years old.

If Mama cuts him out, seriously, what does he have? I don't know what his net worth is, if he has a lot of debt...maybe VRG will end up with not much.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/what-prince-andrew-net-worth-25939091

Looks like $32 million. I wonder what his debts are? Hmm, he lost $250,000 a year not being "HRH". Wow.

 

[CP244]

If Mama cuts him out, seriously, what does he have? I don't know what his net worth is, if he has a lot of debt...maybe VRG will end up with not much.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/what-prince-andrew-net-worth-25939091

Looks like $32 million. I wonder what his debts are? Hmm, he lost $250,000 a year not being "HRH". Wow.

She will not cut him out of his inheritance of her personal wealth.

 

[Spartygirl]

The Daily Mail is one step up from a comic. Look out for articles that have quotes from “an unnamed source”, “a source close to..” etc etc, and cross check against more reputable news outlets like the BBC/ITV/Reuters. Hope that helps.

So true
But they do get the best photos.
IMO

I like to stick to the facts also, as we do here in WS
But, I do enjoy the photos, JMO

 

[Dotta]

She will not cut him out of his inheritance of her personal wealth.

I think his late father also left him something.

 

[Dotta]

Besides, hiring high profile aggressive lawyers blew in his face.
The case, instead of being resolved quietly, exploded spectacularly.
What exactly have they won?
Nothing!
And the whole world is watching.
And other perps are forgotten in this debacle.

 

[BUF]

Besides, hiring high profile aggressive lawyers blew in his face.
The case, instead of being resolved quietly, exploded spectacularly.
What exactly have they won?
Nothing!
And the whole world is watching.
And other perps are forgotten in this debacle.

Agree.

But have to question…could GM no longer objecting to other identities be to try to divert some of this attention away from PA? Just something that crossed my mind.

Ghislaine Maxwell will no longer fight to keep names of 8 'John Does' secret

A lawyer for Maxwell stated in a letter to federal Judge Loretta Preska this week that she would no longer object to the identities of the “John Does” in a 2015 civil lawsuit brought against Maxwell by Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre.

“After careful review of the detailed objections submitted by Non-Party Does 17, 53, 54, 55, 73, 93, and 151, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell writes to inform the Court that she does not wish to further address those objections,” said the Jan. 12 letter, signed by Laura Menninger.

The letter was written the same day that a Manhattan federal court judge refused to dismiss Giuffre’s caseagainst Prince Andrew.

 

[Forest_Wood]

Agree.

But have to question…could GM no longer objecting to other identities be to try to divert some of this attention away from PA? Just something that crossed my mind.

Ghislaine Maxwell will no longer fight to keep names of 8 'John Does' secret

A lawyer for Maxwell stated in a letter to federal Judge Loretta Preska this week that she would no longer object to the identities of the “John Does” in a 2015 civil lawsuit brought against Maxwell by Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre.

“After careful review of the detailed objections submitted by Non-Party Does 17, 53, 54, 55, 73, 93, and 151, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell writes to inform the Court that she does not wish to further address those objections,” said the Jan. 12 letter, signed by Laura Menninger.

I am thinking he must be one of those John Does? moo.

 

[sds71]

In his ruling that a child sexual abuse lawsuit against Prince Andrew can move ahead, Judge Lewis Kaplan took several pages to flatly reject the royal's argument that the law undergirding the entire case is unconstitutional.

"Defendant is not the first litigant to advance this argument, which has been rejected by every New York state and federal court to have encountered it," the federal judge wrote in the 46-page decision. "And it has been rejected repeatedly for good reason."
The concise rejection represents a clear message from the courts: The Child Victims Act, the basis for Virginia Giuffre's lawsuit against Prince Andrew, is here to stay.

The ruling against Prince Andrew is another win for the Child Victims Act's lookback window, experts say - CNN

 

[Chelly]

Besides, hiring high profile aggressive lawyers blew in his face.
The case, instead of being resolved quietly, exploded spectacularly.
What exactly have they won?
Nothing!
And the whole world is watching.
And other perps are forgotten in this debacle.

The other perps should not be forgotten. Their names must be reported and repeated, and reported again.

 

[Chelly]

wrong thread

 

[Dotta]

Prince Andrew was 'left in tears after the Queen told him his titles were being stripped away | Daily Mail Online

 

[tedtink]

When is Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile out?
The special documentary will air at 9pm on Tuesday 18th January on ITV.

Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile: ITV's Release date and what to expect - Radio X

 

[CoverMeCagney]

The other perps should not be forgotten. Their names must be reported and repeated, and reported again.

Yep, this thing needs blowing wide apart. From reading things I won’t repeat here, Andrew is nowhere near being the worst offender in this sordid story. Nor the most famous.

 

[sds71]

Five witnesses who could link Andrew to Virginia, Epstein & Ghislaine

 

[Spartygirl]

Prince Andrew was 'left in tears after the Queen told him his titles were being stripped away | Daily Mail Online

Oh.. booo hoo... cry me a river.

On a side note.. He wasn't too sad to throw/host a party, was he?
A shooting party, none the less.

Target practice, anyone ???
JMO

 

[Dotta]

Oh.. booo hoo... cry me a river.

On a side note.. He wasn't too sad to throw/host a party, was he?
A shooting party, none the less.

Target practice, anyone ???
JMO

A hunter to boot
Ugh!

 

[mickey2942]

Yep, this thing needs blowing wide apart. From reading things I won’t repeat here, Andrew is nowhere near being the worst offender in this sordid story. Nor the most famous.

Very true. But, perhaps PA is low hanging fruit? Easy to get, and maybe not quite as hazardous to reach.

 

[CoverMeCagney]

Very true. But, perhaps PA is low hanging fruit? Easy to get, and maybe not quite as hazardous to reach.

Not locked in to legally binding American NDA contracts, probably. And/or not already paid it off.

 

[Lilibet]

A hunter to the boot
Ugh!

Killing animals for sport is an unpleasant tradition of the Royal Family IMO. Not that American Presidents or their families haven’t done the same (Washington, Teddy Roosevelt, Carter, Bush father and son, Trump’s son and more per Google).

Inside the Royal Family's Hunting Tradition (Yes, Kate Middleton Hunts)

 

[Dotta]

Killing animals for sport is an unpleasant tradition of the Royal Family IMO. Not that American Presidents or their families haven’t done the same (Washington, Teddy Roosevelt, Carter, Bush father and son, Trump’s son and more per Google).

Inside the Royal Family's Hunting Tradition (Yes, Kate Middleton Hunts)

It is beyond my comprehension