There is also a *advertiser censored* version of UP which contains a story line very loosely based on the kids version
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
For reals?
That's a bit weird :-/ kids movies shouldn't be made into sexual parodies!
There is also a *advertiser censored* version of UP which contains a story line very loosely based on the kids version
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
I thought I had read in earlier press reports that he stayed at the BC address on and offAm confused now
The address being quoted for DD is 9 Barton Court, which is ( was I should say ) the home of KD and JP
I always thought DD lived elsewhere - as in round the corner ?
There's a whole world of them loosely based on kids films..I had the misfortune of having to view some of them once as part of a sexual exploitation courseFor reals?
That's a bit weird :-/ kids movies shouldn't be made into sexual parodies!
Ok I know this question has been done to death but just to clarify, I was under the impression that SH & NM have to take the stand but can answer 'no comment' if they do not wish to testify? People on FB are saying they don't have to take the stand if they don't want to?
I've been trying to think of any recent UK cases where the defendant has not testified. That would settle the matter.
ITV Becky Trial ‏@ITVBeckyTrial · 2 mins2 minutes ago
The judge has dismissed a juror because he recognised a witness. Court will now resume on Monday. #beckywatts
So does that mean that juror will be replaced? And I'm guessing that the new juror will have access to all of the same evidence the others have had..ITV Becky Trial ‏@ITVBeckyTrial · 2 mins2 minutes ago
The judge has dismissed a juror because he recognised a witness. Court will now resume on Monday. #beckywatts
Will they have to get a new one in to replace? How is that going to work? Surely it would take all weekend to get them up to speed?
So does that mean that juror will be replaced? And I'm guessing that the new juror will have access to all of the same evidence the others have had..
I thought in cases like this that they tried to pick jury members who aren't from the local area the crime was committed so as to try and stop this like this happening
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Crimes agonist children fb page reporting no replacement juror will be bought in
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
See above thread - they aren't replacing the juror released todayThey've already replaced one juror. Initially there were 11 women and 1 man. This changed to 10 women and 2 men earlier in the case. I think it's now too late for another replacement.
I've been trying to think of any recent UK cases where the defendant has not testified. That would settle the matter.
One thing that I'm just finding astounding is how open Shauna was in her interview about her dislike of Becky. Why would she do that knowing what they had done? She obviously has no issues lying about other aspects of the case so why not lie about her feelings towards her?
Or they've deemed the trial too far along now. I'm guessing if they replaced the juror now then the defendants would try and argue they had an unfair trialOh that's interesting. I remember when it began, someone ( here or elsewhere cant remember which ! ) said that there were 2 alternate jurors, who would sit in the court for about the first five days to listen to evidence.
We know that one of those 2 replaced one of the original jurors, so I am guessing that the second alternate juror was no longer around, being as we are in Week Two now.