ChatteringBirds
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Messages
- 10,149
- Reaction score
- 51,386
IMO people don't panic and flee when there is an accident, though. They still call emergency services, hoping against hope.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The way it was worded sounded to me that with more tests they would be able to give a cause of death. The phrase which I have heard used in other cases is that the results were inconclusive and more tests are needed.I’m extremely perplexed by the fact that there will be more tests needed to determine COD. Perhaps multiple blows/injuries and cut/stab wounds and/or strangulation and they have to narrow it down to which was the fatal cause…?
Law Enforcement?What does LE stand for in this context please?
People use LE to stand for Law Enforcement, which is a term I learnt from following American cases. In the U.K we usually just say police.What does LE stand for in this context please?
I think there is, but only for convicted criminals.Im surprised that with large Pakistani community living in the UK, there is no Extradiction Treaty between two countries.
Definitely could be more tests needed. However you can also be, for example only, shot, stabbed, and beaten but the COD actually was a fatal blow to an internal organ from the knife, gun shot and beating may not have been sufficient to cause the COD, and sometimes more testing is required. But I hope that’s not the case.The way it was worded sounded to me that with more tests they would be able to give a cause of death. The phrase which I have heard used in other cases is that the results were inconclusive and more tests are needed.
I wonder, as it will be a tricky case needing extradition ,whether they are being extra cautious and having a second independent pm or are bringing in a pathologist who has a particular specialism in some area of forensic examinations.
I believe it's not uncommon for 'welfare checks' to be triggered by neighbours detecting an odour or insect activity, or other signs like mail piling up, milk bottles not collected (from the days we had milk delivery), etc. What confuses me about that, though, is the time of the call, if it really was around 3am. Who is awake and snooping on their neighbours (however benevolently) at that hour?
MOO
That's what I think too.My take is someone HEARD something and was concerned enough to call for a Welfare Check. So loud noises, bumps, screaming, crying, yelling, an argument?
That's what I think too.
I think potentially there could be a lead up to it. Concerns growing and the neighbour becoming increasingly concerned over time.It must have been very loud, or frightening to wake someone up and be worried enough to call the police.
I think potentially there could be a lead up to it. Concerns growing and the neighbour becoming increasingly concerned over time.
The family had left the country hours before the phone call to the police so there would not have been arguments heard or loud noises heard in the night. The next door neighbour said the first he knew anything was wrong was when he saw all the police vehicles.My take is someone HEARD something and was concerned enough to call for a Welfare Check. So loud noises, bumps, screaming, crying, yelling, an argument?
I still think someone made a (very) detailed call after the flight landed in Pakistan.The family had left the country hours before the phone call to the police so there would not have been arguments heard or loud noises heard in the night. The next door neighbour said the first he knew anything was wrong was when he saw all the police vehicles.
A visit to check after a call for concern would not warrant numerous police vehicles.