Updates ~ Court clerk information

[Dr. Know?]

I don't know how Putnam's new dockets work but it seems to be seamlessly with the the added information like, progress docket, charges, assestments, sentences, etc..

The only thing that's changed on Tommy's docket is the amount he owes of his fines reads $480.00 balance due. Probably nothing but he had $50,430.00 with zero paid and now $480.00 as his amount due. Use this site to read it as my c&p doesn't show it very well.

Assessments

Number Date Description Total Paid to Date Balance Due
1 08/06/2010 CF - COURT COST $395 $395.00 $0.00 $395.00
2 08/06/2010 CF - CRIMES STOPPER TR $20.00 $0.00 $20.00
3 08/06/2010 CF - DRUG TRUST FUND $15.00 $0.00 $15.00
4 08/06/2010 CF - FINE $50000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00
Totals: $50,430.00 $0.00 $480.00

http://www.putnam-fl.com/clerks_web_apps/criminal_dockets/frame.php

This is from his 1/21/10 charge & sentenced docket.

ETA, I checked Misty's too, hers is just like his. The fine is not carried over apparently in the amount due. Ron's same way.

 

[Whisperer]

He has filed a Motion for Rehearing re the recently denied Motion.

Will he ever stop? What happened to all that bravado.."I'm going to jail, jail don't scare me"

He got a swastika to prove how bad he is. If he is really Arian Brotherhood, there are some requirements to be admitted to the Brotherhood...none of which are legal and should get him some time.

He may have got the tat and is not officially with them. RC is a scaredy cat by nature. He can't be loyal to any person or group. He is a tattletale...for sure.

 

[4Jacy]

Who do you suppose is paying his attorneys' fees? Even if he has a public defender, there are still court costs and filing fees to be paid. I wonder if TN/GGMS are contributing.

 

[Levi]

Ron is claiming prosecution errors. He entered a guilty plea but after being sentenced and sent to prison he decided that the SA who was part of his plea deal did not have jurisdiction. That was the basis of his appeal; the appeal was denied.

He then filed the Motion for Post Conviction Relief. There is no resolution to that Motion showing on Ron's docket info but a second entry of Motion for Post Conviction Relief is showing, so either he modified the first one or he filed a new Motion altogether. I do not believe we have seen documentation of what Ron's basis is for his Motions for Post Conviction Relief but it has been a long time now so it could be posted here somewhere and I am just not remembering it.

Whatever is going on in Ron's mind, he has convinced himself that he was wronged by the authorities, which I find interesting given those are the same authorities who worked with his attorney to get his charges reduced. It appears that even with a plea deal that Ronald agreed to, he is still not happy.

He may be scared that he wasn't truthful in his agreement and is trying to weasel out before it blows up in his face????

 

[lonetraveler]

Who do you suppose is paying his attorneys' fees? Even if he has a public defender, there are still court costs and filing fees to be paid. I wonder if TN/GGMS are contributing.

Most likely they are contributing. They have greased the skids for him for his whole life.

 

[Zoe Bogart]

Will he ever stop? What happened to all that bravado.."I'm going to jail, jail don't scare me"

Now that's a quote for posterity. He should have it tattooed across his forehead, especially the "jail don't scare me" part.

Like others have said, I also believe Mommy and Grandmama are footing his fines.

I still think someone should be watching where GG *advertiser censored* goes when she goes out alone. Does she ever bring flowers or stuffed toys? :waitasec: I mean, shouldn't the family be begging for anyone to come forward with information? Why aren't they?

Thanks for keeping us updated on the court matters.

 

[krkrjx]

I don't know how Putnam's new dockets work but it seems to be seamlessly with the the added information like, progress docket, charges, assestments, sentences, etc..

The only thing that's changed on Tommy's docket is the amount he owes of his fines reads $480.00 balance due. Probably nothing but he had $50,430.00 with zero paid and now $480.00 as his amount due. Use this site to read it as my c&p doesn't show it very well.

Assessments

Number Date Description Total Paid to Date Balance Due
1 08/06/2010 CF - COURT COST $395 $395.00 $0.00 $395.00
2 08/06/2010 CF - CRIMES STOPPER TR $20.00 $0.00 $20.00
3 08/06/2010 CF - DRUG TRUST FUND $15.00 $0.00 $15.00
4 08/06/2010 CF - FINE $50000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00
Totals: $50,430.00 $0.00 $480.00

http://www.putnam-fl.com/clerks_web_apps/criminal_dockets/frame.php

This is from his 1/21/10 charge & sentenced docket.

ETA, I checked Misty's too, hers is just like his. The fine is not carried over apparently in the amount due. Ron's same way.

I believe the "amount due" is the amount due to date. Meaning, they all still owe the full amounts originally assessed but they are all delinquent in paying (because none of them have paid anything to date) so the amount due is the minimum amount that it would take to bring them out of delinquent payment status. Just a guess but that's the only explanation I can come up with.

 

[krkrjx]

Case Status: CASE CLOSED
Defense Atty: SHOEMAKER, TERRY J
Case File Location: CRIMINAL DIVISION

Defendant: CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES
Date of Birth: 10/29/1983
Race/Sex: W/M
Alias: No Alias Records


Progress Docket

Date # Docket Description
01/21/2010 1 COMPLAINT - PCSO DET. T CAMPBELL (1/13/10)

01/21/2010 1 BOOKING NUMBER: N/A

01/21/2010 1 TRAFFICKING IN HYDROCODONE MORE THAN 14 GRAMS LESS

01/21/2010 1 THAN 28 GRAMS

(snipped)

05/23/2011 69 MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF

(snipped)

08/01/2011 73 STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S RULE 3.850 MOTION FOR

08/01/2011 73 POST CONVICTION RELIEF

08/29/2011 74 MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF

10/17/2011 75 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

10/24/2011 76 DEFENDANTS REPLY TO STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS

10/24/2011 76 RULE 3.850 MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF

12/01/2011 77 AMENDED MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF

12/08/2011 78 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF

12/29/2011 79 DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR REHEARING 3.850

01/26/2012 80 ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION

01/26/2012 80 RELIEF

01/26/2012 81 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING


Uh-oh....what now, Mr. I-Ain't-Scared-of-Prison Cummings?

 

[B4igo2it]

PCSO Court Hearing for DanS' 542007CF002375XXAXMX')

01/23/2012 282 NOTICE OF HEARING SET ON 02/10/2012 @ 9:00 AM (the anniversary of Haleigh's disappearance)
01/23/2012 283 ORDER ALLOWING DEFENDANT SELF-REPRESENTATION AND
01/23/2012 283 APPOINTING STAND-BY-COUNSEL (PEYTON QUARLES)
.....

02/01/2012 287 MOTION HEARING MINUTES: DEFT PRESENT, ATT BY
02/01/2012 287 SELF, STATUS CONFERENCE, HEARING CANCELED ON 2/10/12;
02/01/2012 287 TRIAL CONTINUED TO 4/16/12

He's still in jail and his booking says he goes to court March 19.
Why does the Jail Booking have a different court date?

What's up with his court docket Case status?
http://www.putnam-fl.com/clerks_web_apps/criminal_dockets/frame.php
UCN: 542007CF002375XXAXMX
Case File Date: 12/19/2007
Judge: PATTI A CHRISTENSEN
Case Status: CASE CLOSED
Defense Atty:
Case File Location: CRIMINAL DIVISION

This case, this guy, is absolutely unbeliebeable! 4 years later and the games and criminal system mockery continue ... well, at least he remains locked up!

 

[krkrjx]

Donna Brock's appeals attorney has requested oral argument. This request could be opposed by the state and then either dismissed or granted by the court. Even if the state does not oppose, the oral argument request could still be dismissed at the court's discretion. If the request is granted, Brock's attorney will go before the appeals court to argue Donna's case in person rather than just relying on the court to make their decision based on the briefs filed in the matter.

http://www.5dca.org/opinions.shtml

 

[Nonni Brenda]

Donna Brock's appeals attorney has requested oral argument. This request could be opposed by the state and then either dismissed or granted by the court. Even if the state does not oppose, the oral argument request could still be dismissed at the court's discretion. If the request is granted, Brock's attorney will go before the appeals court to argue Donna's case in person rather than just relying on the court to make their decision based on the briefs filed in the matter.

http://www.5dca.org/opinions.shtml

Thanks krkrjx. If her atty does get to go b4 the appeals court, will Donna be there? Hope this shakes things up for justice for Haleigh...May be just wishful thinking on my part. :seeya:

 

[krkrjx]

Thanks krkrjx. If her atty does get to go b4 the appeals court, will Donna be there? Hope this shakes things up for justice for Haleigh...May be just wishful thinking on my part. :seeya:

Info I have been able to find says Donna has no legal right to be present at oral argument before the appeals judges. However, that's not saying she could not be there if the court were to allow it.

I have no idea where to find stats for how often requests for oral argument are granted.

 

[krkrjx]

Brock's attorney's request has been granted by the court. Oral argument in the matter is set for 4/24/2012.

 

[Chablis]

Brock's attorney's request has been granted by the court. Oral argument in the matter is set for 4/24/2012.

This is a good sign, she will probably get released. jmo

 

[Dr. Know?]

Misty is in the big house now. I was sent an email update from Vinelink today.

The inmate for whom you registered, MISTY CROSLIN with offender number V36472, has been transferred from the Lowell Annex to the custody of Lowell Ci-Womens Unt as of 3/1/2012. Your registration has also been transferred. You will continue to receive updates about this offender.

 

[twall]

Misty is in the big house now. I was sent an email update from Vinelink today.

The inmate for whom you registered, MISTY CROSLIN with offender number V36472, has been transferred from the Lowell Annex to the custody of Lowell Ci-Womens Unt as of 3/1/2012. Your registration has also been transferred. You will continue to receive updates about this offender.

BBM-What do you mean?:waitasec: I thought Lowell Annex is considered a "big house".

This is the same facility Hope is at, Donna is at the Annex.

 

[krkrjx]

Second appeal being filed by Mr. Cummings. His first was denied, so he filed his motion for postconviction relief, which was also denied. He motioned for a rehearing and that was denied as well. I am assuming this new action is appealing the denial of rehearing, but I'm only guessing, based on I do not know what else he could have appeal standing for.


UCN: 542010CF000145XXAXMX
Case File Date: 01/21/2010
Judge: CARLOS E MENDOZA
Case Status: APPEAL
Defense Atty: SHOEMAKER, TERRY J
Case File Location: CRIMINAL DIVISION

Defendant: CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES
Date of Birth: 10/29/1983
Race/Sex: W/M
Alias: No Alias Records


Progress Docket

Date # Docket Description
01/21/2010 1 COMPLAINT - PCSO DET. T CAMPBELL (1/13/10)

01/21/2010 1 BOOKING NUMBER: N/A

01/21/2010 1 TRAFFICKING IN HYDROCODONE MORE THAN 14 GRAMS LESS

01/21/2010 1 THAN 28 GRAMS

01/21/2010 2 WARRANT ISSUED - BOND SET AT $150,000.00

01/22/2010 3 ARREST REPORT - 1/20/2010

01/22/2010 3 BOOKING NUMBER: 10-00276

01/22/2010 3 BOND SET AT $150,000.00

(snipped for space)


10/24/2011 76 RULE 3.850 MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF

12/01/2011 77 AMENDED MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF

12/08/2011 78 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF

12/29/2011 79 DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR REHEARING 3.850

01/26/2012 80 ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION

01/26/2012 80 RELIEF

01/26/2012 81 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING

02/27/2012 82 NOTICE OF APPEAL

03/01/2012 83 LETTER TO THE HONORABLE SUSAN WRIGHT

03/01/2012 84 LETTER TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

 

[Dr. Know?]

Historical Information: Lowell Annex was opened in April 2002 and is under the Lowell C.I.It is a reception center and houses female inmates, including those on close management and death row.

http://www.dc.state.fl.us/facilities/region3/367.html

Lowell CI she has to werk plus more fun. More CO's, etc... More general population and contact. jmo

http://www.dc.state.fl.us/facilities/region3/314.html

 

[krkrjx]

Brock's attorney's request has been granted by the court. Oral argument in the matter is set for 4/24/2012.

Oral arguments are live-streamed per the 5th Dist. Court website. It sounds as if all of them are, not just a chosen few. If anyone is interested in this process and wants to hear what will be argued on Donna Brock's behalf, you can tune in a few minutes before the start of proceeding, which is at this time scheduled for 9 AM on April 24, 2012. Just go to the District Court website and click on the Oral Arguments tab along the top of the home page. Also, the proceeding should be archived and available for anyone who cannot listen live.

http://www.5dca.org/default.shtml

 

[4Jacy]

This is a good sign, she will probably get released. jmo

I don't see this as a good sign. She got prescription pills from a dentist, took them across state lines and sold them. She should remain in jail for her part in this. Also, what ever happened to the dentist or did that case just drift off into the sunset?