katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 67,964
- Reaction score
- 239,849
He probably also had an old pair of sneakers from high school. JMOYes, he did have a pair of muck boots, which Candice said were in the camper.
He probably also had an old pair of sneakers from high school. JMOYes, he did have a pair of muck boots, which Candice said were in the camper.
I will preface this by saying that if I were the parent of a missing child, I would move heaven and earth to find them.
I would also like to say, as a former LEO, that you are restrained by law as to what you can do when called to a report of an adult missing person. As an adult in the United States you are protected against unreasonable search and seizure.
Folks have repeatedly criticized LE for not protecting the crime scene and preserving evidence. What crime scene?
When LE first responded, they went to the shed where Dylan was last thought to be headed. After taking a report from Dylan’s parents that their adult son hadn’t been heard from in 2 days, they searched the area and found a pair of boots that the parents believed belong to their son. There was a drop of a substance on the boot that the parents believed to be motor oil. The officer took the boots in case they were needed for scent for tracking dogs. There was also an understanding that the boots would be submitted to a lab to determine if the droplet on the boot was human blood. Aside from the boots, nothing was out of the ordinary in the shed area. Nothing was missing. It showed no sign of being a crime scene.
Officers then responded to Dylan’s home, a trailer that was parked 5 miles away from the grain shed. Dylan’s parents, CC and JR, told LE that he would sometimes walk the 5 miles between these locations. His trailer was parked on the land owned jointly by him and his grandfather and where he was getting ready to plant his first crop.
CC has said that their fear was an accident had happened between the shed and the trailer as he walked, perhaps a snakebite, or that he had fallen and broken a leg.
When LE arrived at the trailer, they observed Dylan’s pickup parked and locked. The trailer showed no sign of ransacking according to the Sheriff and nothing appeared to be missing.
There was no sign that this was a crime scene.
The parents insisted they wanted to get into Dylan’s truck. The truck is actually owned by Dylan’s dad. The sheriff, as reported by CC, probably did say it was their truck and they could do what they wanted. Because they could!
I would only ask that people try to look at this case from both perspectives. Dylan is a 19 year old who has been living on his own and from all accounts is very mature and hardworking. It was a holiday weekend and it was about to rain so he couldn’t work the farm. Suppose he decided to take some time and went off with a friend for a few days after carefully storing his grain and leaving his locked truck at his home? LE has found no evidence that a crime has been committed. They have no right to start towing vehicles, searching his residence or otherwise violating his rights.
If LE arrived at the grain shed or the trailer and found a pool of blood or a body, or the trailer ransacked, or farm equipment stolen, then they would most likely have a crime scene. At that time they would immediately begin a criminal investigation.
Unfortunately in a case like Dylan’s, of a missing adult with no signs of foul play, it is often time that is the indicator that something is wrong; no further contact, no bank transactions, no cell activity. This time factor is what adds to the frustration of victims’ families and also results in possible loss of evidence for LE.
In this litigious society that we live in today, how do we best begin immediate investigations of missing adults while at the same time preserving their privacy and rights?
IMO, it was seeing the boots in the desert, off of DR's feet, that turned both (CC/JR) of their worlds upside down. I think this ocd thing with DR and his very specific brand of footwear is something only the family can relate to. MOO ^^rsbm
Exactly. It’s interesting that those words have been used and it’s not been LE. IMO. The timeline of when the investigation was publicly named a criminal investigation compared to when the truck was in the possession of Idaho State Police gives an interesting perspective as well.
The general silence from LE actually tells more of a story than what some assume as them having nothing. Box Elder alone had 650 hours of investigative hours ALONE days ago per their media release. That’s the agency that has been criticized by the family for not doing enough. 650 hours tells a different story and DOES NOT include counting other agencies. There’s a lot going on behind the scenes. Also, NO ONE has been cleared. MOO
Yeah and a missing gun, a kid who talked to his family ever day, his favorite and only boots discarded, missing cell phone and wallet, oddly parked truck and ever changing stories from key players, a kid who worked his *advertiser censored* off to get to this very moment.
<modsnip> fyi. Dylan didn’t talk to his family every day. He last talked to his father on Thursday, his mother, I believe Wednesday, his grandmother on Saturday. Mom and Dad weren’t even looking for him until Monday when some ranch hands couldn’t locate him. The ranch hands were requested to go by his place by the gma because Dylan had said he’d call her back on Saturday, but didn’t.Yeah and a missing gun, a kid who talked to his family ever day, his favorite and only boots discarded, missing cell phone and wallet, oddly parked truck and ever changing stories from key players, a kid who worked his *advertiser censored* off to get to this very moment.
<modsnip>
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.www.facebook.com
I've always thought this is what it'll take to get any answers. Pretty large sum.
Tried to upload pic of current flyer but I guess it's too large.
Currently "Upto $100,000 reward for information that leads to safe return or recovery"
Thanks for the help, @Seattle1. Computer skills are not my strong pointOP link didn't work for me.
I'll try to compress the flyer as I had the same message (too large for WS server).
Thanks for the update @FlamingoLady.
Well spoke.That they're calling it a "criminal" investigation that says everyone agrees that DR didn't just leave on his own.
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.www.facebook.com
View attachment 351345
I've always thought this is what it'll take to get any answers. Pretty large sum.
Currently "Upto $100,000 reward for information that leads to safe return or recovery, arrest and conviction of person responsible"
A large reward worked in a local case here. A university student and her friend were crossing the street at night (lit crosswalk). They were hit by a speeding car. She died, her friend survived. Friend related, that the car stopped, only to throw off his friend from the front windshield area, and drove off.I've seen some large rewards like this over the years. I can't remember the last time a reward was successful, but I think the numbers are very low.
To be clear, I'm not criticizing them for offering one. I'd try anything if I were in a MP's families shoes too.
Awful story, so glad the reward worked for the victim's parents.A large reward worked in a local case here. A university student and her friend were crossing the street at night (lit crosswalk). They were hit by a speeding car. She died, her friend survived. Friend related, that the car stopped, only to throw off his friend from the front windshield area, and drove off.
Parents were distraught, offered a $250,000 reward for finding the culprit. It worked. Somebody talked. The culprits were a couple, with a baby who was ALSO in the car, living in the neighborhood, hid their car with a cracked windshield in a garage.
It could work here. Somebody might talk for that money. Somebody might decide to move out of the area for "snitching".
Yup. I remember the Mackenzie Lueck case having more suspicious circumstances, but even so, law enforcement initially lacked the probable cause to do much about it.<modsnip> fyi. Dylan didn’t talk to his family every day. He last talked to his father on Thursday, his mother, I believe Wednesday, his grandmother on Saturday. Mom and Dad weren’t even looking for him until Monday when some ranch hands couldn’t locate him. The ranch hands were requested to go by his place by the gma because Dylan had said he’d call her back on Saturday, but didn’t.
LE responded when the parents called them on Monday. It was LE who found a pair of boots that looked like Dylan’s.
If Dylan took a couple of days off on a holiday weekend, he probably brought his wallet, cell phone, and very possibly his side arm with him, (as he did most days). Dylan is an adult male who lives on his own and works a farm. He has every right to go wherever he wants whenever he wants.
<modsnip>