oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,707
**Just one hypothetical point**
Unless LE has definite proof that AA "only" did it for his sadistic satisfaction they can't counter if defense claims KL overdosed.
**It all depends on the proof**
It also depends on whether he is a lose talker.
Imo, it will not matter in the end either way if they can't prove how she was murdered by AA. It won't matter if he talks or not either.
How she was murdered is not a required element the state must prove BARD. If that was a required element then no missing body case would ever end in a successful conviction, yet murderers of missing murdered victims are successfully convicted more than ever before.
The jury will base their verdict on what is the most logical conclusion based on all of the evidence presented to them which will be overwhelming against AA.
Imo, they will not believe the victim died accidently from an overdose or for any other reason other than AA brutally murdered KL, and then horrifically desecrated her body afterwards.
So whatever wild theory the defense may put forth it will fall like a rock.
Most jurors are very reasonable minded people, and recognize an irrational theory when they are being fed one. This case wont be any different either.
Imo, once the ongoing investigation is completed they are going to know he totally premeditated the horrific murder of a totally defenseless victim. And how he carried out his desecration preplan he had in order to hide, and destroy how he murdered KL, and what torture he made her endure.
An aside. I do believe his present attorney will stay on the case unless she is not a death penalty qualified attorney. Imo, that is the only reason she will step aside.
If she does stay her defense will consist of victim blaming since she seems quite proud of being able to get predator rapists off without little or no accountability.
Even with him selecting this particular defense attorney shows this murder of KL was sexually motivated even though motive is not required to be proven by the state either. Imo
Jmho